Local hyperthermia benefits natural and experimental common colds
- PMID: 2500196
- PMCID: PMC1836535
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.298.6683.1280
Local hyperthermia benefits natural and experimental common colds
Erratum in
- BMJ 1989 Sep 2;299(6699):600
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether inhaling fully humidified air at 43 degrees C gave more benefit to cold sufferers than inhaling air at 30 degrees C.
Design: Randomised double blind trial. Setting--General practice and the common cold research unit.
Subjects: 87 Unselected patients with typical acute nasal and upper respiratory symptoms (general practice study), and 84 volunteers aged 18-50 without a history of chronic or allergic diseases.
Interventions: Subjects breathed from apparatus delivering 40 litres of room air heated to 43 degrees C or 30 degrees C and fully humidified (relative humidity 100%) per minute. End point--Reduction in severity of disease. MEASUREMENTS and main results--Patients recorded their symptoms (general practice study) and observers recorded symptoms and signs, weight of nasal secretions, isolation of virus, and antibody responses in volunteers. Patients treated for 20 minutes at 43 degrees C had in the succeeding days roughly half the score for symptoms of those treated at 30 degrees C. Volunteers treated for 30 minutes on three occasions when they were starting a cold showed an 18% [corrected] reduction in symptoms. Treatment of volunteers for 20 minutes at the onset of the cold and for 10 minutes on succeeding days showed no difference between 43 degrees C and 30 degrees C.
Conclusions: Nasal hyperthermia can improve the course of a common cold and also give immediate relief of symptoms.
Similar articles
-
Protocol for a randomised, single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group controlled trial of the efficacy of rhinothermy delivered by nasal high flow therapy in the treatment of the common cold.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 19;9(6):e028098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028098. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31221888 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of inhaling heated vapor on symptoms of the common cold.JAMA. 1990 Aug 22-29;264(8):989-91. JAMA. 1990. PMID: 2376891 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study.BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 27;8(3):e019350. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019350. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29593018 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of the common cold.Am Fam Physician. 2007 Feb 15;75(4):515-20. Am Fam Physician. 2007. PMID: 17323712 Review.
-
Effects on the nasal mucosa of upper respiratory viruses (common cold).Dan Med Bull. 1994 Apr;41(2):193-204. Dan Med Bull. 1994. PMID: 8039434 Review.
Cited by
-
A view from the Common Cold Unit.Antiviral Res. 1992 Jun;18(2):105-25. doi: 10.1016/0166-3542(92)90032-z. Antiviral Res. 1992. PMID: 1329647 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risks of thermal home remedies for COVID-19.Singapore Med J. 2024 Mar 1;65(Suppl 1):S2-S4. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2022062. Epub 2022 May 25. Singapore Med J. 2024. PMID: 35611503 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
How to treat influenza and colds.West J Med. 2000 Apr;172(4):260-4. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.172.4.260. West J Med. 2000. PMID: 10778381 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Problems and prospects of developing effective therapy for common cold viruses.Trends Microbiol. 1997 Feb;5(2):58-63. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(96)10082-2. Trends Microbiol. 1997. PMID: 9108931 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Guideline for "rhinosinusitis"-long version : S2k guideline of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians and the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].HNO. 2018 Jan;66(1):38-74. doi: 10.1007/s00106-017-0401-5. HNO. 2018. PMID: 28861645 German. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical