Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;83(9):648-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

Evaluating the use of mobile phone technology to enhance cardiovascular disease screening by community health workers

Sam Surka  1 , Sisira Edirippulige  2 , Krisela Steyn  3 , Thomas Gaziano  4 , Thandi Puoane  5 , Naomi Levitt  6
Affiliations

Evaluating the use of mobile phone technology to enhance cardiovascular disease screening by community health workers

Sam Surka et al. Int J Med Inform. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD),by identifying individuals at risk is a well-established, but costly strategy when based on measurements that depend on laboratory analyses. A non-laboratory, paper-based CVD risk assessment chart tool has previously been developed to make screening more affordable in developing countries. Task shifting to community health workers (CHWs) is being investigated to further scale CVD risk screening. This study aimed to develop a mobile phone CVD risk assessment application and to evaluate its impact on CHW training and the duration of screening for CVD in the community by CHWs.

Methods: A feature phone application was developed using the open source online platform, CommCare(©). CHWs (n=24) were trained to use both paper-based and mobile phone CVD risk assessment tools. They were randomly allocated to using one of the risk tools to screen 10-20 community members and then crossed over to screen the same number, using the alternate risk tool. The impact on CHW training time, screening time and margin of error in calculating risk scores was recorded. A focus group discussion evaluated experiences of CHWs using the two tools.

Results: The training time was 12.3h for the paper-based chart tool and 3h for the mobile phone application. 537 people were screened. The mean screening time was 36 min (SD=12.6) using the paper-base chart tool and 21 min (SD=8.71) using the mobile phone application, p=<0.0001. Incorrect calculations (4.3% of average systolic BP measurements, 10.4% of BMI and 3.8% of CVD risk score) were found when using the paper-based chart tool while all the mobile phone calculations were correct. Qualitative findings from the focus group discussion corresponded with the findings of the pilot study.

Conclusion: The reduction in CHW training time, CVD risk screening time, lack of errors in calculation of a CVD risk score and end user satisfaction when using a mobile phone application, has implications in terms of adoption and sustainability of this primary prevention strategy to identify people with high CVD risk who can be referred for appropriate diagnoses and treatment.

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease risk assessment; Community health workers; Mobile phones; Task-shifting; mHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The non-laboratory CVD risk assessment chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Population characteristics and levels of CVD risk identified
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Lopez AMC, Ezzati M, Jamison, Murray C. Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors. Oxford University Press and World Bank; Washingtion, DC: 2006.
    1. Gaziano TRK, Paccaud F, et al. Cardiovascular Disease. In: Jamison DTBJ, Measham AR, et al., editors. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd edition World Bank; Washington (DC): 2006. - PubMed
    1. Mathers CDLA, Stein C, Ma Fat D, Rao C, Inoue M, et al. Deaths and disease burden by cause: global burden of disease estimates for 2001 by World Bank country groups. The World Health Organization (WHO) tWB, and the Fogarty International Center, US National Institutes of Health (NIH); Washington: 2003.
    1. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998 May 12;97(18):1837–47. PubMed PMID: 9603539. Epub 1998/05/29. eng. - PubMed
    1. Ferrario M, Chiodini P, Chambless LE, Cesana G, Vanuzzo D, Panico S, et al. Prediction of coronary events in a low incidence population. Assessing accuracy of the CUORE Cohort Study prediction equation. Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;34(2):413–21. PubMed PMID: 15659467. Epub 2005/01/22. eng. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources