Vasectomy and risk of aggressive prostate cancer: a 24-year follow-up study
- PMID: 25002716
- PMCID: PMC4162499
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8446
Vasectomy and risk of aggressive prostate cancer: a 24-year follow-up study
Abstract
Purpose: Conflicting reports remain regarding the association between vasectomy, a common form of male contraception in the United States, and prostate cancer risk. We examined prospectively this association with extended follow-up and an emphasis on advanced and lethal disease.
Patients and methods: Among 49,405 U.S. men in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, age 40 to 75 years at baseline in 1986, 6,023 patients with prostate cancer were diagnosed during the follow-up to 2010, including 811 lethal cases. In total, 12,321 men (25%) had vasectomies. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs of total, advanced, high-grade, and lethal disease, with adjustment for a variety of possible confounders.
Results: Vasectomy was associated with a small increased risk of prostate cancer overall (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.17). Risk was elevated for high-grade (Gleason score 8 to 10; RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.45) and lethal disease (death or distant metastasis; RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.43). Among a subcohort of men receiving regular prostate-specific antigen screening, the association with lethal cancer was stronger (RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.36). Vasectomy was not associated with the risk of low-grade or localized disease. Additional analyses suggested that the associations were not driven by differences in sex hormone levels, sexually transmitted infections, or cancer treatment.
Conclusion: Our data support the hypothesis that vasectomy is associated with a modest increased incidence of lethal prostate cancer. The results do not appear to be due to detection bias, and confounding by infections or cancer treatment is unlikely.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Comment in
-
Prostate cancer: Unravelling bias in vasectomy associations.Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Aug;11(8):425. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.182. Epub 2014 Jul 22. Nat Rev Urol. 2014. PMID: 25048862 No abstract available.
-
Re: Vasectomy and risk of aggressive prostate cancer: a 24-year follow-up study.J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):127-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.075. Epub 2014 Oct 22. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25523658 No abstract available.
-
Words of wisdom. Re: Vasectomy and risk of aggressive prostate cancer: a 24-year follow-up study.Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1186-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.042. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 25587599 No abstract available.
-
Reply to D.C. Sokal et al.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 20;33(6):670-1. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.9498. Epub 2015 Jan 20. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25605836 No abstract available.
-
Prostate cancer and vasectomy: déjà vu!J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 20;33(6):669-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1669. Epub 2015 Jan 20. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25605850 No abstract available.
-
Re: Vasectomy and risk of aggressive prostate cancer: a 24-year follow-up study.J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):628-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.054. Epub 2014 Nov 18. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25617303 No abstract available.
References
-
- Schwingl PJ, Guess HA. Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:923–936. - PubMed
-
- Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, et al. A prospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men. JAMA. 1993;269:873–877. - PubMed
-
- Giovannucci E, Tosteson TD, Speizer FE, et al. A retrospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men. JAMA. 1993;269:878–882. - PubMed
-
- Sidney S, Quesenberry CP, Jr, Sadler MC, et al. Vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer in a cohort of multiphasic health-checkup examinees: Second report. Cancer Causes Control. 1991;2:113–116. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
