Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of early prophylactic feeding via gastrostomy versus standard care in high risk patients with head and neck cancer
- PMID: 25002833
- PMCID: PMC4083037
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6955-13-17
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of early prophylactic feeding via gastrostomy versus standard care in high risk patients with head and neck cancer
Abstract
Background: Patients with head and neck cancer are at high risk of malnutrition and dysphagia. Enteral tube feeding via a gastrostomy or nasogastric tube is often required in response to dysphagia, odynophagia or side effects of treatment that lead to dehydration and/or weight-loss. A recent systematic review concluded that the optimal method of tube feeding remains unclear; however prophylactic gastrostomy, placed in anticipation of its use during and after treatment, is common practice, following a number of demonstrated benefits. However the majority of these studies have been undertaken in patients receiving radiotherapy alone. More recent studies in patient populations receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy are showing that despite prophylactic gastrostomy placement significant weight loss still occurs, placing the patient at risk of the consequences of malnutrition. Therefore we set out to investigate innovative prophylactic nutrition support via the gastrostomy to optimise the nutritional outcomes of patients with head and neck cancer.
Methods/design: Patients with head and neck cancer will be eligible for this single centre randomised controlled trial if they are identified for referral for a prophylactic gastrostomy using local guidelines. Patients will be excluded if they are: under the age of eighteen; pregnant; unable to give informed consent; or severely malnourished or moderately malnourished with significant dysphagia requiring a liquid or puree diet. All eligible patients who consent for the study will be allocated randomly to either the intervention or control group (usual care). The intervention group will commence prophylactic supplementary nutrition support via the gastrostomy immediately following placement compared to usual care where nutrition support is commenced via the gastrostomy when clinically indicated during treatment. Key outcome measures will be percentage weight loss, body composition, nutritional status and quality of life, measured at baseline and three months post treatment.
Discussion: To our knowledge this is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of early prophylactic tube feeding compared to commencement of feeding during treatment, as per current standard practice, in patients undergoing prophylactic gastrostomy prior to treatment for head and neck cancer.
Trial registration: This trial has been registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials registry as ACTRN12612000579897.
Keywords: Enteral nutrition; Gastrostomy; Head and neck cancer; Nutrition support; Prophylactic; Quality of life.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Nutritional and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy Utilizing Prophylactic versus Reactive Nutrition Support Approaches.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Apr;118(4):627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Dec 13. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018. PMID: 27986517
-
Tube feeding during treatment for head and neck cancer - Adherence and patient reported barriers.Oral Oncol. 2017 Sep;72:140-149. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 25. Oral Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28797450
-
Comparison of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with reactive enteral nutrition in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review.Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Dec;46:87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.09.724. Epub 2021 Oct 2. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021. PMID: 34857252
-
Enteral feeding in head and neck cancer patients at a UK cancer centre.J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013 Oct;26(5):421-8. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12029. Epub 2013 Feb 5. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013. PMID: 23379517
-
Prophylactic versus reactive gastrostomy tube placement in advanced head and neck cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review.Oral Oncol. 2018 Dec;87:77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 25. Oral Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30527247
Cited by
-
Impact of sarcopenia and myosteatosis on survival outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing curative-intent treatment.Br J Nutr. 2023 Feb 14;129(3):406-415. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522000435. Epub 2022 Feb 14. Br J Nutr. 2023. PMID: 35152926 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on nutritional status and survival in cervical esophageal cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy.Front Nutr. 2025 Jun 25;12:1521239. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1521239. eCollection 2025. Front Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40635888 Free PMC article.
-
Randomised controlled trial of early prophylactic feeding vs standard care in patients with head and neck cancer.Br J Cancer. 2017 Jun 27;117(1):15-24. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.138. Epub 2017 May 23. Br J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28535154 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
New radiotherapy techniques do not reduce the need for nutrition intervention in patients with head and neck cancer.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015 Oct;69(10):1119-24. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.141. Epub 2015 Aug 26. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015. PMID: 26306565
References
-
- Brown T, Findlay M, Von Dincklage J, Davidson W, Hill J, Isenring E, Talwar B, Bell K, Kiss N, Kurmis R, Loeliger J, Sandison A, Taylor K, Bauer J. Using a wiki platform to promote guidelines internationally and maintain their currency: evidence-based guidelines for the nutritional management of adult patients with head and neck cancer. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013;26(2):182–190. - PubMed
-
- Garg S, Yoo J, Winquist E. Nutritional support for head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(6):667–677. - PubMed
-
- Nugent B, Lewis S, O’Sullivan JM. Enteral feeding methods for nutritional management in patients with head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;3 CD007904. - PubMed
-
- Corry J, Poon W, McPhee N, Milner AD, Cruickshank D, Porceddu SV, Rischin D, Peters LJ. Randomized study of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tubes for enteral feeding in head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiation. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52(5):503–510. - PubMed
-
- Sadasivan A, Faizal B, Kumar M. Nasogastric and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube use in advanced head and neck cancer patients: a comparative study. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012;26(3):226–232. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources