Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014:2014:913047.
doi: 10.1155/2014/913047. Epub 2014 Jun 9.

Analysis of age as a possible prognostic factor for transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy

Affiliations

Analysis of age as a possible prognostic factor for transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy

Emre Ayintap et al. J Ophthalmol. 2014.

Abstract

Purpose. To assess the prognostic value of age on the outcome of transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy (TCL-DCR) in patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). Methods. The medical records of TCL-DCR performed between March 2009 and September 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria include over 20 years of age, similar mean follow-up period, and similar mean duration of stenting. The main outcome is surgical success. The effect of age on success rate is also evaluated. Results. The anatomical success was 52% in Group 1 (20-30 years), 56% in Group 2 (31-40 years), 64% in Group 3 (41-50 years), 76% in Group 4 (51-60 years), and 88% in Group 5 (over 60 years). The statistical difference among Group 1 and Group 5, in terms of surgical success rate, was found to be significant (P = 0.009). Additionally, the 20-30-year-old patients had a failure rate 6.76 times higher than that of the over-60-year-old patients (P = 0.009; 95% CI, 1.605-28.542). Conclusion. TCL-DCR is a surgical treatment option for NLDO for which a skin incision can be avoided. The success rate of TCL-DCR for younger population is lower when compared with elderly population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tarbet KJ, Custer PL. External dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical success, patient satisfaction, and economic cost. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(7):1065–1070. - PubMed
    1. Buttanri IB, Serin D, Karslioğlu S, et al. The outcome of silicone intubation and tube removal in external dacryocystorhinostomy patients with distal canalicular obstruction. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012;22(6):878–881. - PubMed
    1. Buttanri IB, Ayintap E, Serin D, Akbaba M, Karslioglu S. Comparison of revision surgeries with transcanalicular diode laser and external approaches in cases with failed transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2014;30(3):209–211. - PubMed
    1. Lee S, Yen MT. Laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy: a viable treatment option? Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2011;22(5):413–418. - PubMed
    1. Karim R, Ghabrial R, Lynch TF, Tang B. A comparison of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2011;5(1):979–989. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources