The impact of oral contraceptive initiation on young women's condom use in 3 American cities: missed opportunities for intervention
- PMID: 25003504
- PMCID: PMC4086953
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101804
The impact of oral contraceptive initiation on young women's condom use in 3 American cities: missed opportunities for intervention
Abstract
Purpose: To describe women's condom use and assess predictors of consistent condom use and dual method use in the 6 months after the initiation of oral contraception (OC).
Methods: We conducted a planned secondary cohort analysis among women less than 25 years of age initiating oral contraceptives at public family planning clinics in Atlanta, Dallas and New York City, USA, as part of a randomized trial. These clinics provide care to predominantly African American or Hispanic women of low socioeconomic status. Participants completed interviews at enrollment and at 6 months after OC start. We used multivariate logistic regression to assess factors associated with consistent condom and dual method use at 6 months.
Results: 1281 participants met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. At enrollment prior to OC start, 28% were consistent condom users. In the six months after initiation of oral contraception, only 14% always used a condom and 4% always used dual methods. In multivariate analysis, receiving basic advice to always use a condom after OC initiation from a provider during the baseline clinic consultation was associated with a 50% increase in the odds of using condoms consistently. Only 28% of participants were given this condom use advice.
Conclusions: This study documents a decline in women's condom consistent use subsequent to initiation of the oral contraceptive and suggests that opportunities for positive intervention around condom use among women starting hormonal methods are being missed. Basic condom use advice, which is neither time consuming nor resource dependent, was associated with increased consistent use and should be immediately implemented in all family planning services.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
With pills, patches, rings, and shots: who still uses condoms? A longitudinal cohort study.J Adolesc Health. 2013 Jan;52(1):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Oct 8. J Adolesc Health. 2013. PMID: 23260838 Free PMC article.
-
Women's satisfaction with birth control: a population survey of physical and psychological effects of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, condoms, natural family planning, and sterilization among 1466 women.Contraception. 1999 May;59(5):277-86. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00034-7. Contraception. 1999. PMID: 10494480
-
Condom practices of urban teens using Norplant contraceptive implants, oral contraceptives, and condoms for contraception.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;180(4):929-37. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70664-2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999. PMID: 10203661
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
[Current status of the female condom in Africa].Sante. 1997 Nov-Dec;7(6):405-15. Sante. 1997. PMID: 9503499 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Variability in Condom Use Trends by Sexual Risk Behaviors: Findings from the 2003-2015 National Youth Risk Behavior Surveys.Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Jun;45(6):400-405. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000763. Sex Transm Dis. 2018. PMID: 29465682 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Condom Use Among Female US High School Students: Implications for Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention.JAMA Pediatr. 2016 May 1;170(5):428-34. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0007. JAMA Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 26974492 Free PMC article.
-
Dual Contraceptive Method Use Among Youth in Alternative Schools.J Prim Prev. 2016 Dec;37(6):561-567. doi: 10.1007/s10935-016-0453-4. J Prim Prev. 2016. PMID: 27798719
-
Condom and Contraceptive Use Among Sexually Active High School Students - Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019.MMWR Suppl. 2020 Aug 21;69(1):11-18. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6901a2. MMWR Suppl. 2020. PMID: 32817600 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with uptake of dual contraception among HIV-infected women in Bungoma County, Kenya: a cross-sectional study.Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Nov 2;28(Suppl 1):2. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2017.28.1.9289. eCollection 2017. Pan Afr Med J. 2017. PMID: 30167030 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jones J, Mosher WD, Daniels K (2012) Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006–2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995. National Health Statistics Reports 60. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr060.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2014. - PubMed
-
- Finer LB, Henshaw SK (2006) Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 38: 90–96. - PubMed
-
- Bearinger LH, Resnick MD (2003) Dual method use in adolescents: a review and framework for research on use of STD and pregnancy protection. J Adolesc Health 32: 340–349. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous