Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials
- PMID: 25006191
- PMCID: PMC4110472
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju129
Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials
Abstract
Background: The National Cancer Institute's Symptom Management and Health-Related Quality of Life Steering Committee held a clinical trials planning meeting (September 2011) to identify a core symptom set to be assessed across oncology trials for the purposes of better understanding treatment efficacy and toxicity and to facilitate cross-study comparisons. We report the results of an evidence-synthesis and consensus-building effort that culminated in recommendations for core symptoms to be measured in adult cancer clinical trials that include a patient-reported outcome (PRO).
Methods: We used a data-driven, consensus-building process. A panel of experts, including patient representatives, conducted a systematic review of the literature (2001-2011) and analyzed six large datasets. Results were reviewed at a multistakeholder meeting, and a final set was derived emphasizing symptom prevalence across diverse cancer populations, impact on health outcomes and quality of life, and attribution to either disease or anticancer treatment.
Results: We recommend that a core set of 12 symptoms--specifically fatigue, insomnia, pain, anorexia (appetite loss), dyspnea, cognitive problems, anxiety (includes worry), nausea, depression (includes sadness), sensory neuropathy, constipation, and diarrhea--be considered for inclusion in clinical trials where a PRO is measured. Inclusion of symptoms and other patient-reported endpoints should be well justified, hypothesis driven, and meaningful to patients.
Conclusions: This core set will promote consistent assessment of common and clinically relevant disease- and treatment-related symptoms across cancer trials. As such, it provides a foundation to support data harmonization and continued efforts to enhance measurement of patient-centered outcomes in cancer clinical trials and observational studies.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Core symptom measures in cancer clinical trials.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul 8;106(7):dju173. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju173. Print 2014 Jul. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. PMID: 25006193 No abstract available.
References
-
- Edgerly M, Fojo T. Is there room for improvement in adverse event reporting in the era of targeted therapies? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(4):240–242 - PubMed
-
- Gebbia V, Bellavia G, Ferrau F, Valerio MR. Adherence, compliance and persistence to oral antineoplastic therapy: a review focused on chemotherapeutic and biologic agents. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012;11(Suppl 1):S49–S59 - PubMed
-
- Gotay C, Dunn J. Adherence to long-term adjuvant hormonal therapy for breast cancer. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(6):709–715 - PubMed
-
- Oberguggenberger A, Hubalek M, Sztankay M, et al. Is the toxicity of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy underestimated? Complementary information from patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;128(2):553–561 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials