Neighborhood Income Matters: Disparities in Community Recreation Facilities, Amenities, and Programs
- PMID: 25006598
- PMCID: PMC4082954
Neighborhood Income Matters: Disparities in Community Recreation Facilities, Amenities, and Programs
Abstract
Physical activity is important for children's development and their current and future health; national recommendations are for them to engage in at least 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity daily. Most of children's physical activity occurs outside of school hours; thus, access to and the quality of community recreation facilities and programming are particularly relevant. Researchers have identified strong links among socioeconomic disparities, physical inactivity, and poor health, but a limited number of studies have examined how access to community recreation facilities and physical activity programming are affected by local socioeconomic conditions. In many low-income communities, park and recreation facilities may be the only place for children to be physically active outside of school; thus, it is important to understand the connection between community environmental characteristics and child use of facilities. We were interested in determining whether the characteristics of community recreation center environments would be associated with neighborhood income and children's use of the centers. To do this we designed a study to identify whether neighborhood income disparities were associated with recreation center environmental characteristics and whether those characteristics were associated with young children's use of the center. We believed that findings to these questions could inform policy decisions within recreation centers and recreation departments to improve equity, facility use, and levels of physical activity. Thirty community recreation centers and 541 nearby families with children aged 5-8 years in five cities in Southern California participated in the study. To generate data we used multiple research instrumentation including (a) a structured physical activity survey of program offerings and barriers to children's participation in physical activity at the center [completed by recreation center supervisors], (b) direct observation of the presence and condition of recreation center facilities and amenities by trained assessors, and (c) a parent questionnaire on child use of the center. Results indicated that the condition of the community center facilities and amenities, but not their number, was positively related to neighborhood income (p < .05). As well, the number of cost-free, but not total, youth physical activity programs was inversely associated with neighborhood income (p < .05). Parent's report of their children using centers was positively associated with the number of amenities observed there (p < .05). The results suggest that policy makers and community recreation center staff should consider both neighborhood economic issues and environmental characteristics in their efforts to promote children's physical activity at recreation centers.
Keywords: Built environment; children; facilities; health; physical activity; recreation centers; socioeconomic status.
Similar articles
-
Children's physical activity and parents' perception of the neighborhood environment: neighborhood impact on kids study.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Mar 27;10:39. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-39. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013. PMID: 23531282 Free PMC article.
-
Neighborhood characteristics associated with park use and park-based physical activity among children in low-income diverse neighborhoods in New York City.Prev Med. 2020 Feb;131:105948. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105948. Epub 2019 Dec 10. Prev Med. 2020. PMID: 31836479
-
Residential Neighborhood Amenities and Physical Activity Among U.S. Children with Special Health Care Needs.Matern Child Health J. 2017 May;21(5):1026-1036. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2198-3. Matern Child Health J. 2017. PMID: 28025767
-
Can the Neighborhood Built Environment Make a Difference in Children's Development? Building the Research Agenda to Create Evidence for Place-Based Children's Policy.Acad Pediatr. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Nov 25. Acad Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 26432681 Review.
-
Promoting activity participation and well-being among children and adolescents: a systematic review of neighborhood built-environment determinants.JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Mar;18(3):370-458. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00051. JBI Evid Synth. 2020. PMID: 32197008
Cited by
-
A Framework for Pediatric Health Care Providers to Promote Active Play in Nature for Children.J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221114842. doi: 10.1177/21501319221114842. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022. PMID: 35942948 Free PMC article.
-
Violent Crime and Park Use in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods.Am J Prev Med. 2018 Mar;54(3):352-358. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.025. Epub 2018 Jan 12. Am J Prev Med. 2018. PMID: 29338953 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Timing and Amount of Outdoor Play in Emotional Dysregulation in Preschool Children.Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Jan;51(1):e70020. doi: 10.1111/cch.70020. Child Care Health Dev. 2025. PMID: 39704197 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of weight status, sex, age, sedentary behavior, pubertal status and socioeconomic status on the physical activity of children and adolescents.BMC Public Health. 2025 May 7;25(1):1680. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22867-1. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40335978 Free PMC article.
-
Park use patterns and park satisfaction before and after citywide park renovations in low-income New York City neighborhoods.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07264-3. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40596329 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Babey SH, Hastert TA, Yu H, Brown ER. Physical activity among adolescents. When do parks matter? American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;34:345–348. - PubMed
-
- Bouffard SM, Wimer C, Caronongan P, Little P, Dearing E, Simpkins SD. Demographic differences in patterns of youth out-of-school time activity participation. Journal of Youth Development. 2006;1(1):24–39.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials