Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 19;86(16):8206-12.
doi: 10.1021/ac501537w. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

Temperature-ramped (129)Xe spin-exchange optical pumping

Affiliations

Temperature-ramped (129)Xe spin-exchange optical pumping

Panayiotis Nikolaou et al. Anal Chem. .

Abstract

We describe temperature-ramped spin-exchange optical pumping (TR-SEOP) in an automated high-throughput batch-mode (129)Xe hyperpolarizer utilizing three key temperature regimes: (i) "hot"-where the (129)Xe hyperpolarization rate is maximal, (ii) "warm"-where the (129)Xe hyperpolarization approaches unity, and (iii) "cool"-where hyperpolarized (129)Xe gas is transferred into a Tedlar bag with low Rb content (<5 ng per ∼1 L dose) suitable for human imaging applications. Unlike with the conventional approach of batch-mode SEOP, here all three temperature regimes may be operated under continuous high-power (170 W) laser irradiation, and hyperpolarized (129)Xe gas is delivered without the need for a cryocollection step. The variable-temperature approach increased the SEOP rate by more than 2-fold compared to the constant-temperature polarization rate (e.g., giving effective values for the exponential buildup constant γSEOP of 62.5 ± 3.7 × 10(-3) min(-1) vs 29.9 ± 1.2 × 10(-3) min(-1)) while achieving nearly the same maximum %PXe value (88.0 ± 0.8% vs 90.1% ± 0.8%, for a 500 Torr (67 kPa) Xe cell loading-corresponding to nuclear magnetic resonance/magnetic resonance imaging (NMR/MRI) enhancements of ∼3.1 × 10(5) and ∼2.32 × 10(8) at the relevant fields for clinical imaging and HP (129)Xe production of 3 T and 4 mT, respectively); moreover, the intercycle "dead" time was also significantly decreased. The higher-throughput TR-SEOP approach can be implemented without sacrificing the level of (129)Xe hyperpolarization or the experimental stability for automation-making this approach beneficial for improving the overall (129)Xe production rate in clinical settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Schematic of batch-mode 129Xe spin-exchange optical pumping (SEOP) using a high-power laser diode array (LDA) and 0.5 L optical pumping (OP) cell. (b) A brief qualitative summary of 129Xe SEOP parameter regions studied here Xe density and incident laser power. Note that <5 ng of residual Rb quantity in the Tedlar bag (after HP gas expansion) has been utilized in FDA-approved clinical trial protocols.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Positive-pressure gas loading manifold (nominal pressure is 2.7 atm for a 0.5 L OP-cell), which consists of Teflon pneumatic valves and tubing, one-way check valves, in-line O2 and Rb getters/filters, vacuum and pressure sensors, and two exit paths: “in vivo” (i.e., for clinical use) and “in vitro” (i.e., for experiments not involving living organisms). Implementation of the Rb filter does not appear to measurably impact 129Xe hyperpolarization (ref (20)).
Figure 3
Figure 3
129Xe optical pumping (hyperpolarization) buildup curves for an OP-cell filled with 500 Torr 129Xe/1500 Torr N2 gas mixture under variable temperatures of 42, 55, 72, 74 °C, and TR-SEOP (74 → 72 °C).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Exponential fit buildup (72 °C) and decay curves of the OP cell cool down to 42 and 55 °C, respectively, of 500 Torr 129Xe. (b) T1 decay of hyperpolarized 129Xe (500 Torr partial pressure) at room temperature with the laser turned off.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Operational diagrams of clinical-scale batch-mode SEOP polarizers: conventional (top) and enabled by the new temperature-ramped (TR) SEOP method presented here (bottom).

References

    1. Kurhanewicz J.; Vigneron D. B.; Brindle K.; Chekmenev E. Y.; Comment A.; Cunningham C. H.; DeBerardinis R. J.; Green G. G.; Leach M. O.; Rajan S. S.; Rizi R. R.; Ross B. D.; Warren W. S.; Malloy C. R. Neoplasia 2011, 13, 81–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goodson B. M. J. Magn. Reson. 2002, 155, 157–216. - PubMed
    1. Ruset I. C.; Tsai L. L.; Mair R. W.; Patz S.; Hrovat M. I.; Rosen M. S.; Muradian I.; Ng J.; Topulos G. P.; Butler J. P.; Walsworth R. L.; Hersman F. W. Concepts Magn. Reson., Part B 2006, 29B, 210–221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsai L. L.; Mair R. W.; Rosen M. S.; Patz S.; Walsworth R. L. J. Magn. Reson. 2008, 193, 274–285. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Branca R. T.; Cleveland Z. I.; Fubara B.; Kumar C. S. S. R.; Maronpot R. R.; Leuschner C.; Warren W. S.; Driehuys B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 10783693–3697. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms