Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;47(4):672-8.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu257. Epub 2014 Jul 9.

Outcome after heart transplantation from older donor age: expanding the donor pool

Affiliations

Outcome after heart transplantation from older donor age: expanding the donor pool

David Prieto et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: There has been a progressive expansion of heart donor selection criteria, including higher age limit. We analysed the impact of using hearts from older age donors (>50 years).

Methods: Between November 2003 and December 2012, 228 heart transplantations were performed. Children and patients requiring ventricular assistance prior to transplantation were excluded. Recipients from 26 donors aged ≥ 50 years (Group A) were compared with those of 136 donors <40 years (Group B). Patient and donor criteria were identical in both groups.

Results: Group A recipients were older than those in Group B (59 ± 11 vs 53 ± 11; P < 0.01), and tended to have more ischaemic cardiomyopathy (50 vs 35%; P = 0.16), be in intensive care (31 vs 27%; P = 0.65) and have longer waiting time (56 ± 49 vs 41 ± 47 days; P = 0.15). There were also significant differences in ischaemic time (65 ± 27 vs 93 ± 35 min; P < 0.01). Thirty-day mortality was similar (3.8 vs 3.7%; P = 0.97). Follow-up was 55 ± 32 months. Actuarial survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 84 ± 7% for Group A and 90 ± 3, 86 ± 3 and 81 ± 4%, respectively, for Group B (P = 0.85). There were no survival differences between patients younger and older than 60 years, but there was a tendency for decreased survival free from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in Group A compared to Group B (at 8 years 65 ± 18 vs 78 ± 7%; P = 0.06).

Conclusions: Parameters of exclusion of donor hearts can and must be adjusted, since the use of selected marginal donors associated with short ischaemic times appears to have no negative impact on morbidity and mortality, more importantly when compared with mortality on the waiting list.

Keywords: Allograft vasculopathy; Heart transplantation; Old donors; Outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer