How safe are new drugs? Market withdrawal of drugs approved in Canada between 1990 and 2009
- PMID: 25009681
- PMCID: PMC4085091
How safe are new drugs? Market withdrawal of drugs approved in Canada between 1990 and 2009
Abstract
Background: Studying drugs withdrawn from the market for safety reasons can help in evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the pre- and post-market safety evaluation systems. This study considered 2 questions: Has there been a change over time in the percentage of new drugs that are eventually withdrawn because of safety reasons? How long are new drugs on the market before their serious safety problems are recognized?
Methods: All drugs approved between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2009 and subsequently withdrawn for safety reasons (until 1 October 2013) were identified, and the generic name, date of approval, and date of withdrawal were recorded. The total number of drugs approved over the same period was obtained from annual Health Canada reports. The percentages of new active substances approved in the 5-year periods 1990-1994, 1995-1999, 2000-2004, and 2005-2009 and eventually withdrawn were compared using the χ(2) test. The time between approval and withdrawal was calculated in days.
Results: Of the 528 new drugs approved over the period of interest, a total of 22 (4.2%) were eventually withdrawn. Between 3.9% and 4.4% of the drugs approved in each 5-year period were eventually withdrawn (χ(2) = 0.04, p = 0.99 for difference among 5-year periods). The median time between approval and withdrawal was 1271 days (interquartile range 706-2876).
Interpretation: One explanation for the finding of no difference in the percentage of drugs approved in the four 5-year periods that were eventually withdrawn is the lack of any change in the rigour of the premarket evaluation system and the postmarket surveillance systems. The 1271-day median time between Notice of Compliance and withdrawal emphasizes the need to be particularly cautious in prescribing new drugs early in their life cycle.
Conflict of interest statement
In 2007, Joel Lexchin was a consultant to a law firm acting for Apotex Inc. In 2008, he was an expert witness for the Canadian federal government in its defence against a lawsuit challenging the ban on direct-to-consumer advertising. In 2010, he was an expert witness for a law firm representing the family of a plaintiff who allegedly died from an adverse reaction to a product made by Allergan. He is currently on the Management Group of Healthy Skepticism Inc. and is Chair of the Association Board of Health Action International – Europe.
References
-
- Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet. 2005;365(9453):82–93. - PubMed
-
- Lexchin J. New drugs and safety: what happened to new active substances approved in Canada between 1995 and 2010? Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(21):1680–1681. - PubMed
-
- Lexchin J. Relationship between pharmaceutical company user fees and drug approvals in Canada and Australia: a hypothesisgenerating study. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(12):2216–2222. - PubMed
-
- Rawson N. New drug approval times and safety warnings in the United States and Canada, 1992–2011. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2013;20(2):e67–e81. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources