Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 10;9(7):e102257.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102257. eCollection 2014.

Trophic facilitation or limitation? Comparative effects of pumas and black bears on the scavenger community

Affiliations

Trophic facilitation or limitation? Comparative effects of pumas and black bears on the scavenger community

Maximilian L Allen et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Scavenging is a widespread behaviour and an important process influencing food webs and ecological communities. Large carnivores facilitate the movement of energy across trophic levels through the scavenging and decomposition of their killed prey, but competition with large carnivores is also likely to constrain acquisition of carrion by scavengers. We used an experimental approach based on motion-triggered video cameras at black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) carcasses to measure the comparative influences of two large carnivores in the facilitation and limitation of carrion acquisition by scavengers. We found that pumas (Puma concolor) and black bears (Ursus americanus) had different effects on their ecological communities. Pumas, as a top-level predator, facilitated the consumption of carrion by scavengers, despite significantly reducing their observed sum feeding times (165.7 min ± 21.2 SE at puma kills 264.3 min ± 30.1 SE at control carcasses). In contrast, black bears, as the dominant scavenger in the system, limited consumption of carrion by scavengers as evidenced by the observed reduction of scavenger species richness recorded at carcasses where they were present (mean = 2.33 ± 0.28 SE), compared to where they were absent (mean = 3.28 ± 0.23 SE). Black bears also had large negative effects on scavenger sum feeding times (88.5 min ± 19.8 SE at carcasses where bears were present, 372.3 min ± 50.0 SE at carcasses where bears were absent). In addition, we found that pumas and black bears both increased the nestedness (a higher level of order among species present) of the scavenger community. Our results suggest that scavengers have species-specific adaptions to exploit carrion despite large carnivores, and that large carnivores influence the structure and composition of scavenger communities. The interactions between large carnivores and scavengers should be considered in future studies of food webs and ecological communities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A map of the study area, in Mendocino National Forest.
The study area is outlined by the thick black line, within the greater context of the North Coast Range and California.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The detection rate of black bears among seasons at different carcass types.
Detection varied among seasons, and the detection for deer carcasses used for the black bear experiments, those killed by pumas, and the matching puma control carcasses are shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The seasonal distribution of scavenger species richness (number of scavengers present) and sum feeding time in minutes (total time scavengers spent feeding).
Each season is represented as a mean with the error bars representing standard error. We did not include samples on the graphs where there were <3 samples for a season.

References

    1. DeVault TL, Rhodes Jr OE, Shivik JA (2003) Scavenging by vertebrates: behavioral, ecological, and evolutionary perspectives on an important energy transfer pathway in terrestrial ecosystems. Oikos 102: 225–234.
    1. Wilmers CC, Crabtree RL, Smith DW, Murphy KM, Getz WM (2003a) Trophic facilitation by introduced top predators: grey wolf subsidies to scavengers in Yellowstone National Park. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 909–916.
    1. Barton PS, Cunningham SA, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD (2013) The role of carrion in maintaining biodiversity and ecological processes in terrestrial ecosystems. Oecologia 171: 761–772. - PubMed
    1. Wilmers CC, Stahler DR, Crabtree RL, Smith DW, Getz WM (2003b) Resource dispersion and consumer dominance: scavenging at wolf– and hunter–killed carcasses in greater Yellowstone, USA. Ecology Letters 6: 996–1003.
    1. Selva N, Fortuna MA (2007) The nested structure of a scavenger community. Proceedings of the Royal Biological Society of London 274: 1101–1108. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources