Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Sep:166:36-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 11.

Persistence in the long term of the effects of a collaborative care programme for depression in primary care

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Persistence in the long term of the effects of a collaborative care programme for depression in primary care

Enric Aragonès et al. J Affect Disord. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: A collaborative care programme for depression in primary care has proven clinical effectiveness over a 12-months period. Because depression tends to relapse and to chronic course, our aim was to determine whether the effectiveness observed in the first year persists during 3 years of monitoring.

Methods: Randomised controlled trial with twenty primary care centres were allocated to intervention group or usual care group. The intervention consisted of a collaborative care programme with clinical, educational and organisational procedures. Outcomes were monitored by a blinded interviewer at baseline, 12 and 36 months. Clinical outcomes were response to treatment and remission rates, depression severity and health-related quality of life.

Trial registration: ISRCTN16384353.

Results: A total of 338 adult patients with major depression (DSM-IV) were assessed at baseline. At 36 months, 137 patients in the intervention group and 97 in the control group were assessed (attrition 31%). The severity of depression (mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score) was 0.95 points lower in the intervention group [6.31 versus 7.25; p=0.324]. The treatment response rate was 5.6% higher in the intervention group than in the control group [66.4% versus 60.8%; p=0.379] and the remission rate was 9.2% higher [57.7% versus 48.5%; p=0.164]. No difference reached statistical significance.

Limitations: The number of patients lost (31%) before follow-up may have introduced a bias.

Conclusions: Clinical benefits shown in the first year were not maintained beyond: at 36 months the differences between the control group and the intervention group reduced in all the analysed variables.

Keywords: Collaborative care; Controlled clinical trial; Depression; Disease management; Primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources