Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jun 26:5:294.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00294. eCollection 2014.

Forest response and recovery following disturbance in upland forests of the Atlantic Coastal Plain

Affiliations
Review

Forest response and recovery following disturbance in upland forests of the Atlantic Coastal Plain

Karina V R Schäfer et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Carbon and water cycling of forests contribute significantly to the Earth's overall biogeochemical cycling and may be affected by disturbance and climate change. As a larger body of research becomes available about leaf-level, ecosystem and regional scale effects of disturbances on forest ecosystems, a more mechanistic understanding is developing which can improve modeling efforts. Here, we summarize some of the major effects of physical and biogenic disturbances, such as drought, prescribed fire, and insect defoliation, on leaf and ecosystem-scale physiological responses as well as impacts on carbon and water cycling in an Atlantic Coastal Plain upland oak/pine and upland pine forest. During drought, stomatal conductance and canopy stomatal conductance were reduced, however, defoliation increased conductance on both leaf-level and canopy scale. Furthermore, after prescribed fire, leaf-level stomatal conductance was unchanged for pines but decreased for oaks, while canopy stomatal conductance decreased temporarily, but then rebounded the following growing season, thus exhibiting transient responses. This study suggests that forest response to disturbance varies from the leaf to ecosystem level as well as species level and thus, these differential responses interplay to determine the fate of forest structure and functioning post disturbance.

Keywords: forest disturbance; forest response; modeling; oaks; physiology; pine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of New Jersey (insert) with the New Jersey Pine Barrens highlighted in the center. Large map shows the oak/pine sites and the pine site. The long-term site is designated in orange (see also description in text).
Figure 2
Figure 2
P. rigida canopy and leaf level stomatal responses to prescribed fire at the 2011 fire site, Brendan T Byrne Forest, see also Renninger et al. (2013).

References

    1. Agrawal A. A. (2007). Macroevolution of plant defense strategies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 103–109 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amiro B. D., Barr A. G., Barr J. G., Black T. A., Bracho R., Brown M., et al. (2010). Ecosystem carbon dioxide fluxes after disturbance in forests of North America. J. Geophys. Res. 115, G00K02 10.1029/2010JG001390 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderegg W. R. L., Plavcová L., Anderegg L. D. L., Hacke U. G., Berry J. A., Field C. B. (2013). Drought's legacy: multiyear hydraulic deterioration underlies widespread aspen forest die-off and portends increased future risk. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 1188–1196 10.1111/gcb.12100 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ayres M. P., Lombardero M. J. (2000). Assessing the consequences of global change for forest disturbance from herbivores and pathogens. Sci. Total Environ. 262, 263–286 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00528-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker W. L. (1941). Effect of gypsy moth defoliation on certain forest trees. J. For. 39, 1017–1022