Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul 11;19(7):10150-76.
doi: 10.3390/molecules190710150.

Challenges, applications, and recent advances of protein-ligand docking in structure-based drug design

Affiliations
Review

Challenges, applications, and recent advances of protein-ligand docking in structure-based drug design

Sam Z Grinter et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

The docking methods used in structure-based virtual database screening offer the ability to quickly and cheaply estimate the affinity and binding mode of a ligand for the protein receptor of interest, such as a drug target. These methods can be used to enrich a database of compounds, so that more compounds that are subsequently experimentally tested are found to be pharmaceutically interesting. In addition, like all virtual screening methods used for drug design, structure-based virtual screening can focus on curated libraries of synthesizable compounds, helping to reduce the expense of subsequent experimental verification. In this review, we introduce the protein-ligand docking methods used for structure-based drug design and other biological applications. We discuss the fundamental challenges facing these methods and some of the current methodological topics of interest. We also discuss the main approaches for applying protein-ligand docking methods. We end with a discussion of the challenging aspects of evaluating or benchmarking the accuracy of docking methods for their improvement, and discuss future directions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liljefors T., Krogsgaard-Larsen P., Madsen U. Textbook of Drug Design and Discovery. 3rd ed. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2003.
    1. Khanna I. Drug discovery in pharmaceutical industry: Productivity challenges and trends. Drug Discov. Today. 2012;17:1088–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.05.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Overington J.P., Al-Lazikani B., Hopkins A.L. How many drug targets are there? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006;5:993–996. - PubMed
    1. Schneider G., Böhm H.J. Virtual screening and fast automated docking methods. Drug Discov. Today. 2002;7:64–70. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(01)02091-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scior T., Bender A., Tresadern G., Medina-Franco J.L., Martínez-Mayorga K., Langer T., Cuanalo-Contreras K., Agrafiotis D.K. Recognizing pitfalls in virtual screening: A critical review. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012;52:867–881. doi: 10.1021/ci200528d. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources