Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Mar;29(3):244-60.
doi: 10.1177/0269215514542636. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

Can the Alexander Technique improve balance and mobility in older adults with visual impairments? A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Can the Alexander Technique improve balance and mobility in older adults with visual impairments? A randomized controlled trial

Michael Gleeson et al. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of Alexander Technique lessons on balance and mobility in older adults with visual impairments.

Design: Randomized assessor blinded controlled trial with intervention and usual care control groups.

Setting: Participants' homes.

Subjects: A total of 120 community-dwellers aged 50+ with visual impairments.

Intervention: Twelve weeks of Alexander lessons and usual care.

Main outcome measures: Short Physical Performance Battery items were primary outcomes at 3 months and secondary outcomes at 12 months. Additional secondary outcomes were postural sway, maximal balance range and falls over 12 months.

Results: Between-group differences in primary outcomes were not significant. The intervention group reduced postural sway on a firm surface with eyes open at 3 months after adjusting for baseline values (-29.59 mm, 95%CI -49.52 to -9.67, P < 0.01). Planned sub-group analyses indicated a greater intervention effect among past multiple-fallers (2+) than non-multiple fallers for gait speed (P = 0.02) and step length (P < 0.01) at 3 months and chair stand at 12 months (P < 0.01). There was a non-significant reduction in falls rate (IRR = 0.64, 95%CI 0.34 to 1.15, P = 0.13) and injurious falls (IRR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.30, P = 0.20) in the intervention group compared to the control group.

Conclusion: The intervention did not have a significant impact on the primary outcomes but benefits for the intervention group in postural sway, trends towards fewer falls and injurious falls and improved mobility among past multiple-fallers suggest further investigation of the Alexander Technique is warranted.

Keywords: Alexander Technique; Visual impairment; balance; mobility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types