Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e98003.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098003. eCollection 2014.

The impact of drug reimbursement policy on rates of testosterone replacement therapy among older men

Affiliations

The impact of drug reimbursement policy on rates of testosterone replacement therapy among older men

Jolanta Piszczek et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Despite a lack of data describing the long-term efficacy and safety of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), prescribing of testosterone to older men has increased with the availability of topical formulations. The magnitude of this increase and the impact of formulary restrictions on testosterone prescribing are poorly characterized.

Methods: We conducted a time series analysis using the linked health administrative records of men aged 66 years or older in Ontario, Canada between January 1, 1997 and March 31, 2012. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to examine the impact of a restrictive drug reimbursement policy on testosterone prescribing and examined the demographic profile of men initiating testosterone in the final 2 years of the study period.

Results: A total of 28,477 men were dispensed testosterone over the study period. Overall testosterone prescribing declined 27.9% in the 6 months following the implementation of the restriction policy (9.5 to 6.9 men per 1000 eligible; p<0.01). However, the overall decrease was temporary and testosterone use exceeded pre-policy levels by the end of the study period (11.0 men per 1000 eligible), largely driven by prescriptions for topical testosterone (4.8 men per 1000 eligible). Only 6.3% of men who initiated testosterone had a documented diagnosis of hypogonadism, the main criteria for TRT reimbursement according to the new policy.

Conclusion: Government-imposed restrictions did not influence long-term prescribing of testosterone to older men. By 2012, approximately 1 in every 90 men aged 66 or older was being treated with TRT, most with topical formulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Muhammad Mamdani has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck and Bayer. Tony Antoniou has received unrestricted research grants from Merck and Pfizer for different studies. No other authors have any conflicts of interest to report. All the authors confirm that this does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Rate of Testosterone Use per 1,000 Men Eligible for Public Drug Coverage and Aged 65 and older.
Figure 1 depicts a steady 286% increase in testosterone use between 1997 and 2003, and a subsequent plateau in 2004 and 2005. In early 2006, the introduction of universal prescribing restrictions for TRT led to a 27.9% drop in total user rates within a 6 month period, driven by the decline of oral (p<0.01) and injectable (p<0.01), but not topical testosterone use. However, after this initial drop, total TRT use started to increase again and by the end of the study period (March 2012) TRT rates had reached a historical peak of 11.0 men per 1000 eligible population. This increase was largely driven by the use of topical testosterone products, while rates of oral and injectable use each fell 32% and 35% respectively after the universal restriction policy was implemented and remained at this new low.

References

    1. Liverman KT, Blazer DG, editors. (2004) Testosterone and Aging: Clinical Research Directions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 1 p. - PubMed
    1. Handelsman DJ (2012) Pharmacoepidemiology of testosterone prescribing in Australia, 1992–2010. Med J Aust 196: 642–645. - PubMed
    1. Baillargeon J, Urban RJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Pierson KS, Goodwain JS (2013) Trends in Androgen Prescribing in the United States, 2001 to 2011. JAMA Intern Med 173: 1465–1466. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, Matsumoto AM, Snyder PJ, et al. (2010) Testosterone therapy in men with androgen deficiency syndromes: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: 2536–2559. - PubMed
    1. Feldman HA, Longcope C, Derby CA, Johannes CB, Araujo AB, et al. (2002) Age trends in the level of serum testosterone and other hormones in middle-aged men: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 589–598. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms