Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;10(7):20140356.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0356.

Maternal food quantity affects offspring feeding rate in Daphnia magna

Affiliations

Maternal food quantity affects offspring feeding rate in Daphnia magna

Jennie S Garbutt et al. Biol Lett. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Maternal effects have wide-ranging effects on life-history traits. Here, using the crustacean Daphnia magna, we document a new effect: maternal food quantity affects offspring feeding rate, with low quantities of food triggering mothers to produce slow-feeding offspring. Such a change in the rate of resource acquisition has broad implications for population growth or dynamics and for interactions with, for instance, predators and parasites. This maternal effect can also explain the previously puzzling situation that the offspring of well-fed mothers, despite being smaller, grow and reproduce better than the offspring of food-starved mothers. As an additional source of variation in resource acquisition, this maternal effect may also influence relationships between life-history traits, i.e. trade-offs, and thus constraints on adaptation. Maternal nutrition has long-lasting effects on health and particularly diet-related traits in humans; finding an effect of maternal nutrition on offspring feeding rate in Daphnia highlights the utility of this organism as a powerful experimental model for exploring the relationship between maternal diet and offspring fitness.

Keywords: maternal effects; population dynamics; resource acquisition; trade-offs; transgenerational effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Feeding rate of offspring whose mothers received high (H) or low (L) food in two experiments with (a) eight European genotypes (to estimate among-population variation) and (b) 10 Scottish genotypes (to estimate within-population variation). Data are fitted means.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Additive third and fourth appendage limb filter screen area in offspring whose mothers received high or low food plotted against body length.

References

    1. Mousseau TA, Fox CW. 1998. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 403–407. (10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01472-4) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marshall DJ, Uller T. 2007. When is a maternal effect adaptive? Oikos 116, 1957–1963. (10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16203.x) - DOI
    1. Colbourne JK, et al. 2011. The ecoresponsive genome of Daphnia pulex. Science 331, 555–561. (10.1126/science.1197761) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lampert W, Brendelberger H. 1996. Strategies of phenotypic low-food adaptation in Daphnia: filter screens, mesh sizes, and appendage beat rates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41, 216–223. (10.4319/lo.1996.41.2.0216) - DOI
    1. Pop M. 1991. Mechanisms of the filtering area adaptation in Daphnia. Hydrobiologia 225, 169–176. (10.1007/BF00028394) - DOI

Publication types