Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014:2014:591867.
doi: 10.1155/2014/591867. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

Current approaches for predicting a lack of response to anti-EGFR therapy in KRAS wild-type patients

Affiliations
Review

Current approaches for predicting a lack of response to anti-EGFR therapy in KRAS wild-type patients

Tze-Kiong Er et al. Biomed Res Int. 2014.

Abstract

Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been one of the most effective colorectal cancer strategies. Anti-EGFR antibodies function by binding to the extracellular domain of EGFR, preventing its activation, and ultimately providing clinical benefit. KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 are recognized prognostic and predictive biomarkers that should be analyzed at the clinic prior to the administration of anti-EGFR therapy. However, still an important fraction of KRAS wild-type patients do not respond to the treatment. The identification of additional genetic determinants of primary or secondary resistance to EGFR targeted therapy for further improving the selection of patients is urgent. Herein, we review the latest published literature highlighting the most important genes that may predict resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer patients. According to the available findings, the evaluation of BRAF, NRAS, PIK3CA, and PTEN status could be the right strategy to select patients who are likely to respond to anti-EGFR therapies. In the future, the combination of those biomarkers will help establish consensus that can be introduced into clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Downstream signaling proteins of EGFR: (a) KRAS, (b) NRAS, (c) BRAF, and (d) PIK3CA. The most frequent activating mutation sites are shown as red spheres.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Signaling pathways implicated in the lack of response to anti-EGFR therapies. ∗ indicates some receptors or downstream effectors which are responsible for anti-EGFR resistance when they are mutated or overexpressed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A panel of different genes will be a step forward in the “personalized medicine” of CRC patients for selecting patients and predicting efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy. KRAS WT: no mutations were detected in exons 2, 3, and 4.

References

    1. Siegel R, Desantis C, Virgo K, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2012;62(4):220–241. - PubMed
    1. Walther A, Johnstone E, Swanton C, Midgley R, Tomlinson I, Kerr D. Genetic prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2009;9(7):489–499. - PubMed
    1. Sunada H, Magun BE, Mendelsohn J, MacLeod CL. Monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor is internalized without stimulating receptor phosphorylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1986;83(11):3825–3829. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith CG, Fisher D, Claes B, et al. Somatic profiling of the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway in tumors from patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy ± cetuximab. Clinical Cancer Research. 2013;19(15):4104–4113. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao L, Vogt PK. Helical domain and kinase domain mutations in p110α of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase induce gain of function by different mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(7):2652–2657. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms