Brain invasion assessability in meningiomas is related to meningioma size and grade, and can be improved by extensive sampling of the surgically removed meningioma specimen

Abstract

Aims: Despite the important prognostic value of brain invasion in meningiomas, little attention has been paid to its massessment, and the parameters associated with brain invasion assessability (identification of brain tissue in the surgical specimen) are not well characterized. The aim of our study was to determine the parameters that are associated with brain invasion assessability and brain invasion in meningiomas.

Material and methods: By binary logistic regression analysis, we studied the association of various clinical and pathologic parameters with brain invasion assessabilitym and brain invasion in 294 meningiomas: 149 unselected consecutive meningiomas with extensive sampling, diagnosed in 2009 and 2010, collected prospectively, and 145 meningiomas diagnosed in 1999 and 2000 when little attention was paid to brain invasion assessment.

Results: Meningioma grade, size and number of tissue blocks were independent predictors of brain invasion assessability. Brain tissue was identified in 78 of 233 (33%) benign, 33 of 51 (65%) atypical, and 10 of 10 (100%) malignant meningiomas. In univariate analysis, group (prospective vs.retrospective), type (recurrent vs. primary), cleavability, meningioma grade and mitotic count were predictors of brain invasion, while only meningioma grade, and group retained predictive value in multivariate analysis. Brain invasion, when assessable, was identified in 22 of 78 (28%) benign, 21 of 33 (64%) atypical, and 10 of 10 (100%) malignant meningiomas.

Conclusions: Brain invasion assessability is related to meningioma grade and size and can be improved by extensive sampling of meningioma surgical.