Patterns of care among patients receiving radiation therapy for bone metastases at a large academic institution
- PMID: 25035214
- PMCID: PMC4332799
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.028
Patterns of care among patients receiving radiation therapy for bone metastases at a large academic institution
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates outcomes and patterns of care among patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) for bone metastases at a high-volume academic institution.
Methods and materials: Records of all patients whose final RT course was for bone metastases from April 2007 to July 2012 were identified from electronic medical records. Chart review yielded demographic and clinical data. Rates of complicated versus uncomplicated bone metastases were not analyzed.
Results: We identified 339 patients whose final RT course was for bone metastases. Of these, 52.2% were male; median age was 65 years old. The most common primary was non-small-cell lung cancer (29%). Most patients (83%) were prescribed ≤10 fractions; 8% received single-fraction RT. Most patients (52%) had a documented goals of care (GOC) discussion with their radiation oncologist; hospice referral rates were higher when patients had such discussions (66% with vs 50% without GOC discussion, P=.004). Median life expectancy after RT was 96 days. Median survival after RT was shorter based on inpatient as opposed to outpatient status at the time of consultation (35 vs 136 days, respectively, P<.001). Hospice referrals occurred for 56% of patients, with a median interval between completion of RT and hospice referral of 29 days and a median hospice stay of 22 days.
Conclusions: These data document excellent adherence to American Society for Radiation Oncolology Choosing Wisely recommendation to avoid routinely using >10 fractions of palliative RT for bone metastasis. Nonetheless, single-fraction RT remains relatively uncommon. Participating in GOC discussions with a radiation oncologist is associated with higher rates of hospice referral. Inpatient status at consultation is associated with short survival.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
In regard to Olson et al and Ellsworth et al.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 1;90(5):1258. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.040. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014. PMID: 25539376 No abstract available.
-
Evolving treatment patterns for metastatic bone disease: the role of SBRT: in regard to Olson et al and Ellsworth et al.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Feb 1;91(2):451-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.008. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015. PMID: 25636769 No abstract available.
-
In reply to Raince and Bloom.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Feb 1;91(2):452. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.007. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015. PMID: 25636770 No abstract available.
-
In reply to Raince and Bloom and Olson.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Feb 1;91(2):452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.052. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015. PMID: 25636771 No abstract available.
References
-
- International Atomic Energy Agency . Criteria for Palliation of Bone MetastasesdClinical Applications. International Atomic Energy Agency; Vienna, Austria: 2007.
-
- Chow E, Harris K, Fan G, et al. Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1423–1436. - PubMed
-
- Fischberg D, Bull J, Casarett D, et al. Five things physicians and patients should question in hospice and palliative medicine. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;45:595–605. - PubMed
-
- Lutz S, Berk L, Chang E, et al. [April 11, 2014];Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Available at: https://www.astro.org/uploadedFiles/Main_Site/Clinical_Practice/Guidelin.... - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
