Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 19:14:237.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-237.

Prenatal screening for congenital anomalies: exploring midwives' perceptions of counseling clients with religious backgrounds

Affiliations

Prenatal screening for congenital anomalies: exploring midwives' perceptions of counseling clients with religious backgrounds

Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: In the Netherlands, prenatal screening follows an opting in system and comprises two non-invasive tests: the combined test to screen for trisomy 21 at 12 weeks of gestation and the fetal anomaly scan to detect structural anomalies at 20 weeks. Midwives counsel about prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies and they are increasingly having to counsel women from religious backgrounds beyond their experience. This study assessed midwives' perceptions and practices regarding taking client's religious backgrounds into account during counseling. As Islam is the commonest non-western religion, we were particularly interested in midwives' knowledge of whether pregnancy termination is allowed in Islam.

Methods: This exploratory study is part of the DELIVER study, which evaluated primary care midwifery in The Netherlands between September 2009 and January 2011. A questionnaire was sent to all 108 midwives of the twenty practices participating in the study.

Results: Of 98 respondents (response rate 92%), 68 (69%) said they took account of the client's religion. The two main reasons for not doing so were that religion was considered irrelevant in the decision-making process and that it should be up to clients to initiate such discussions. Midwives' own religious backgrounds were independent of whether they paid attention to the clients' religious backgrounds. Eighty midwives (82%) said they did not counsel Muslim women differently from other women. Although midwives with relatively many Muslim clients had more knowledge of Islamic attitudes to terminating pregnancy in general than midwives with relatively fewer Muslim clients, the specific knowledge of termination regarding trisomy 21 and other congenital anomalies was limited in both groups.

Conclusion: While many midwives took client's religion into account, few knew much about Islamic beliefs on prenatal screening for congenital anomalies. Midwives identified a need for additional education. To meet the needs of the changing client population, counselors need more knowledge of religious opinions about the termination of pregnancy and the skills to approach religious issues with clients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wiegers TA. The quality of maternity care services as experienced by women in the Netherlands. BMC Pregn Childbirth. 2009;9:18–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fracheboud J, van Agt HME, de Koning HJ. [Monitoring 2009 Screeningsprogramma Down Syndroom en Structureel Echoscopisch onderzoek] Bilthoven: RIVM; 2011. Monitoring 2009 Screening programme Down syndrome and second-trimester ultrasound for structural anomalies.
    1. RIVM. Draaiboek prenatale screening. Bilthoven: RIVM; 2011. Roadmap of prenatal screening.
    1. Schoonen HM, van Agt HM, Essink-Bot ML, Wildschut HI, Steegers EA, de Koning HJ. Informed decision-making in prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome: what knowledge is relevant? Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):265–270. - PubMed
    1. Oepkes P, Wieringa J. The right to prenatal knowledge; 20-week ultrasound for structural anomalies makes an informed choice possible [Recht op prenatale kennis; 20-weken echo maakt weloverwogen keuze mogelijk] Medisch Contact. 2008;31/32:1296–1297.

Publication types

MeSH terms