Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Jan;135(1):67-75.
doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.306. Epub 2014 Jul 21.

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria who remain symptomatic on H1 antihistamines: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria who remain symptomatic on H1 antihistamines: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Sarbjit S Saini et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Jan.
Free PMC article

Erratum in

Abstract

ASTERIA I was a 40-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous omalizumab as add-on therapy for 24 weeks in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) who remained symptomatic despite H1 antihistamine treatment at licensed doses. Patients aged 12-75 years with CIU/CSU who remained symptomatic despite treatment with approved doses of H1 antihistamines were randomized (1:1:1:1) in a double-blind manner to subcutaneous omalizumab 75 mg, 150 mg, or 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks followed by 16 weeks of follow-up. The primary end point was change from baseline in weekly itch severity score (ISS) at week 12. Among randomized patients (N=319: placebo n=80, omalizumab 75 mg n=78, 150 mg n=80, 300 mg n=81), 262 (82.1%) completed the study. Compared with placebo (n=80), mean weekly ISS was reduced from baseline to week 12 by an additional 2.96 points (95% confidence interval (CI): -4.71 to -1.21; P=0.0010), 2.95 points (95% CI: -4.72 to -1.18; P=0.0012), and 5.80 points (95% CI: -7.49 to -4.10; P<0.0001) in the omalizumab 75-mg (n=77), 150-mg (n=80), and 300-mg groups (n=81), respectively. The omalizumab 300-mg group met all nine secondary end points, including a significant decrease in the duration of time to reach minimally important difference response (⩾5-point decrease) in weekly ISS (P<0.0001) and higher percentages of patients with well-controlled symptoms (urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) ⩽6: 51.9% vs. 11.3%; P<0.0001) and complete response (UAS7=0: 35.8% vs. 8.8%; P<0.0001) versus placebo. During the 24-week treatment period, 2 (2.9%), 3 (3.4%), 0, and 4 (5.0%) patients in the omalizumab 75-mg, 150-mg, 300-mg, and placebo groups, respectively, experienced a serious adverse event. Omalizumab 300 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks reduced weekly ISS and other symptom scores versus placebo in CIU/CSU patients who remained symptomatic despite treatment with approved doses of H1 antihistamines.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01287117.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition and study. Gray arrowheads denote study drug treatment on day 1 and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. Black arrow indicates primary end point assessment at week 12. 1Reasons for screen failure: 14.0% of patients were unwilling to give written informed consent, adhere to the visit schedules, and meet study requirements; 10.5% of patients were not diagnosed with chronic idiopathic urticaria/spontaneous urticaria refractory to H1 antihistamines at the time of randomization; and 27.5% of patients were categorized as “Other, not defined.” 2Patient did not receive study drug as a result of not meeting all study eligibility criteria and was therefore not included in the modified intention-to-treat population. 3Defined as either the worsening of or no improvement in symptoms. 4Seven patients randomized to the omalizumab 75-mg group received at least one dose of omalizumab 150 mg during the treatment period and were included in the omalizumab 150-mg group for the safety and pharmacokinetic analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean weekly itch severity score by study week. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Arrows indicate study drug injection day. Analyzed on the basis of the modified intention-to-treat population with missing weekly scores imputed using baseline weekly itch severity scores.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Responder analysis. P-value versus placebo derived from the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel χ2-test stratified by baseline UAS7 (<median, ⩾median) and baseline weight (<80 kg, ⩾80 kg). 1Not evaluated for statistical significance in accordance with the type I error control plan. UAS7, urticaria activity score over 7 days.

Comment in

References

    1. Asero R. Chronic unremitting urticaria: is the use of antihistamines above the licensed dose effective? A preliminary study of cetirizine at licensed and above-licensed doses. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007;32:34–8. - PubMed
    1. Beck LA, Marcotte GV, MacGlashan D, et al. Omalizumab-induced reductions in mast cell FcɛRI expression and function. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:527–30. - PubMed
    1. European Medicines Agency 2014. Summary of product characteristics (omalizumab (Xolair)). http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Info... last accessed 3 April 2014
    1. Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)–a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19:210–6. - PubMed
    1. Genentech, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation 2014. Xolair (omalizumab) prescribing information. http://www.gene.com/gene/products/information/pdf/xolair-prescribing.pdf last accessed 3 April 2014

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data