Similar articles

• [History and future of coronary artery bypass grafting].

  Shimahara Y, Kobayashi J. Shimahara Y, et al. Nihon Rinsho. 2016 Jun 20;74 Suppl 4 Pt 1:440-5. Nihon Rinsho. 2016. PMID: 27534210 Japanese. No abstract available.
• The comparative efficacy of percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization in 2009: a review.

  May SA, Wilson JM. May SA, et al. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009;36(5):375-86. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009. PMID: 19876412 Free PMC article. Review.
• The Evolution of Coronary Bypass Surgery Will Determine Its Relevance as the Standard of Care for the Treatment for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.

  Glineur D, Gaudino M, Grau J. Glineur D, et al. Circulation. 2016 Oct 25;134(17):1206-1208. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025226. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 27777289 Review. No abstract available.
• [Myocardial revascularization in the early XXIst century: less and less bypass indications].

  Monassier JP, Monassier F. Monassier JP, et al. Presse Med. 2008 Nov;37(11):1575-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 Sep 10. Presse Med. 2008. PMID: 18786805 French. No abstract available.
• Revascularization Strategies for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

  Tam DY, Dharma C, Rocha RV, Austin PC, Wijeysundera HC, Farkouh M, Gaudino M, Sadat S, Lee DS, Fremes SE. Tam DY, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009082. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009082. Epub 2020 Sep 2. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32873050 No abstract available.