Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e004905.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004905.

The Sight Loss and Vision Priority Setting Partnership (SLV-PSP): overview and results of the research prioritisation survey process

Affiliations

The Sight Loss and Vision Priority Setting Partnership (SLV-PSP): overview and results of the research prioritisation survey process

Fiona Rowe et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The Sight Loss and Vision Priority Setting Partnership aimed to identify research priorities relating to sight loss and vision through consultation with patients, carers and clinicians. These priorities can be used to inform funding bodies' decisions and enhance the case for additional research funding.

Design: Prospective survey with support from the James Lind Alliance.

Setting: UK-wide National Health Service (NHS) and non-NHS.

Participants: Patients, carers and eye health professionals. Academic researchers were excluded solely from the prioritisation process. The survey was disseminated by patient groups, professional bodies, at conferences and through the media, and was available for completion online, by phone, by post and by alternative formats (Braille and audio).

Outcome measure: People were asked to submit the questions about prevention, diagnosis and treatment of sight loss and eye conditions that they most wanted to see answered by research. Returned survey questions were reviewed by a data assessment group. Priorities were established across eye disease categories at final workshops.

Results: 2220 people responded generating 4461 submissions. Sixty-five per cent of respondents had sight loss and/or an eye condition. Following initial data analysis, 686 submissions remained which were circulated for interim prioritisation (excluding cataract and ocular cancer questions) to 446 patients/carers and 218 professionals. The remaining 346 questions were discussed at final prioritisation workshops to reach agreement of top questions per category.

Conclusions: The exercise engaged a diverse community of stakeholders generating a wide range of conditions and research questions. Top priority questions were established across 12 eye disease categories.

Keywords: James Lind Alliance; Partnership; Priorities; Research; Sight loss; Vision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart showing the steps of the process from stage 1 when establishing the Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) through to stage 5 at the final prioritisation (PICO, Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Background of respondents showing that questions were largely received from people who have sight loss or an eye condition, but also including eye health professions, organisations, parents, family and carers.

References

    1. Access Economics. Future Sight Loss UK 1: The economic impact of partial sight and blindness in the UK adult population, RNIB, 2009
    1. http://www.vision2020uk.org.uk/
    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009;374:86–9 - PubMed
    1. Sight Loss and Vision Priority Setting Partnership. Setting priorities for eye research. Final report; 2013. http://www.sightlosspsp.org.uk
    1. Stewart R, Oliver S. A systematic map of studies of patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities. London: James Lind Alliance, 2008

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources