Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Feb;29(2):141-6.
doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0026. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

In vivo comparison of radiation exposure of dual-energy CT versus low-dose CT versus standard CT for imaging urinary calculi

Affiliations
Comparative Study

In vivo comparison of radiation exposure of dual-energy CT versus low-dose CT versus standard CT for imaging urinary calculi

Maria A Jepperson et al. J Endourol. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is an emerging imaging modality with the unique capability of determining urinary stone composition. This study compares radiation exposure of DECT, standard single-energy CT (SECT), and low-dose renal stone protocol single-energy CT (LDSECT) for the evaluation of nephrolithiasis in a single in vivo patient cohort.

Materials and methods: Following institutional review board (IRB) approval, we retrospectively reviewed 200 consecutive DECT examinations performed on patients with suspected urolithiasis over a 6-month period. Of these, 35 patients had undergone examination with our LDSECT protocol, and 30 patients had undergone examination of the abdomen and pelvis with our SECT imaging protocol within 2 years of the DECT examination. The CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) was used to compare radiation exposure between scans. Image quality was objectively evaluated by comparing image noise. Statistical evaluation was performed using a Student's t-test.

Results: DECT performed at 80/140 kVp and 100/140 kVp did not produce a significant difference in radiation exposure compared with LDSECT (p=0.09 and 0.18, respectively). DECT performed at 80/140 kVp and 100/140 kVp produced an average 40% and 31%, respectively, reduction in radiation exposure compared with SECT (p<0.001). For patients imaged with the 100/140 kVp protocol, average values for images noise were higher in the LDSECT images compared with DECT images (p<0.001) and there was no significant difference in image noise between DECT and SECT images in the same patient (p=0.88). Patients imaged with the 80/140 kVp protocol had equivocal image noise compared with LDSECT images (p=0.44), however, DECT images had greater noise compared with SECT images in the same patient (p<0.001). Of the 75 patients included in the study, stone material was available for 16; DECT analysis correctly predicted stone composition in 15/16 patients (93%).

Conclusion: DECT provides knowledge of stone composition in addition to the anatomic information provided by LDSECT/SECT without increasing patient radiation exposure and with minimal impact on image noise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Axial (A) dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) material-specific (B) diagnostic and (C) conventional single-energy low-dose renal stone protocol images through the left kidney in the same patient demonstrate a small renal calculus. The calculus is purple on the material-specific dual-energy images indicating a nonuric acid stone. The arrow in each image is pointing to the stone.
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
Axial (A) DECT diagnostic image and (B) conventional single-energy image through the abdomen in the same patient. A region of interest is drawn in the aorta for comparison of image noise.

References

    1. Teichman JM. Clinical practice: Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus. N Engl J Med 2004;350:684–693 - PubMed
    1. Abramson S, Walders N, Applegate KE, et al. . Impact in the emergency department of unenhanced CT on diagnostic confidence and therapeutic efficacy in patients with suspected renal colic: A prospective survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1689–1695 [Abstract] - PubMed
    1. Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, et al. . The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 1998;159:735–740 - PubMed
    1. Boulay I, Holtz P, Foley WD, et al. . Ureteral calculi: Diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1485–1490 [Abstract] - PubMed
    1. Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK, et al. . Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: Improved characterization of renal stone composition—Pilot study. Radiology 2009;250:813–820 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources