Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Nov;40(6):447-54.
doi: 10.3109/00952990.2014.938160. Epub 2014 Jul 25.

A comparison between brand-specific and traditional alcohol surveillance methods to assess underage drinkers' reported alcohol use

Sarah P Roberts  1 , Michael B Siegel, William DeJong, David H Jernigan
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison between brand-specific and traditional alcohol surveillance methods to assess underage drinkers' reported alcohol use

Sarah P Roberts et al. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Adolescent alcohol consumption remains common and is associated with many negative health outcomes. Unfortunately, common alcohol surveillance methods often underestimate consumption. Improved alcohol use measures are needed to characterize the landscape of youth drinking.

Objectives: We aimed to compare a standard quantity-frequency measure of youth alcohol consumption to a novel brand-specific measure.

Methods: We recruited a sample of 1031 respondents across the United States to complete an online survey. Analyses included 833 male and female underage drinkers ages 13-20. Respondents reported on how many of the past 30 days they consumed alcohol, and the number of drinks consumed on an average drinking day. Using our brand-specific measure, respondents identified which brands they consumed, how many days they consumed each brand, and how many drinks per brand they usually had.

Results: Youth reported consuming significantly more alcohol (on average, 11 drinks more per month) when responding to the brand-specific versus the standard measure (p < 0.001). The two major predictors of the difference between the two measures were being a heavy episodic drinker (p < 0.001, 95% CI = 4.1-12.0) and the total number of brands consumed (p < 0.001, 95% CI = 2.0-2.8).

Conclusion: This study contributes to the field of alcohol and adolescent research first by investigating a potentially more accurate alcohol surveillance method, and secondly by promoting the assessment of alcohol use among adolescents vulnerable to risky alcohol use. Finally, our survey addresses the potential impact of alcohol marketing on youth and their subsequent alcohol brand preferences and consumption.

Keywords: Alcohol; brand; surveillance; underage drinking; youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bye EK, Rossow I. The impact of drinking pattern on alcohol-related violence among adolescents: An international comparative analysis: Drinking patterns and violence in adolescence. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009 Oct 5;29(2):131–137. - PubMed
    1. Committee on Substance Abuse. Alcohol Use by Youth and Adolescents: A Pediatric Concern. Pediatrics. 2010 Apr 12;125(5):1078–1087. - PubMed
    1. Currie C. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people: health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (survey)
    1. Mason WA, Toumbourou JW, Herrenkohl TI, Hemphill SA, Catalano RF, Patton GC. Early age alcohol use and later alcohol problems in adolescents: Individual and peer mediators in a bi-national study. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011;25(4):625–633. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rehm J, Gmel G, Sempos CT, Trevisan M. Alcohol-related morbidity and mortality. Alcohol Res Health J Natl Inst Alcohol Abuse Alcohol. 2003;27(1):39–51. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources