Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;29(9):1159-69.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1972-1. Epub 2014 Jul 27.

Evaluation of four comorbidity indices and Charlson comorbidity index adjustment for colorectal cancer patients

Affiliations

Evaluation of four comorbidity indices and Charlson comorbidity index adjustment for colorectal cancer patients

Stefano Marventano et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer survival is related not only to primary malignancy but also to concomitant nonmalignant diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic capacity of four comorbidity indices [the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), the Elixhauser method, the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) comorbidity index, and the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27)] for both cancer-related and all-cause mortality among colorectal cancer patients. A modified version of the CCI adapted for colorectal cancer patients was also built.

Methods: The study population comprised 468 cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2010 at a community hospital. Data were prospectively collected and abstracted from patients' clinical records. Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate logistic regression models were performed for survival and risk of death analysis.

Results: Only moderate or severe renal disease [hazard ratio (HR) 2.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-6.63] and AIDS (HR 3.27, 95% CI 1.23-8.68) were independently associated with cancer-specific mortality, with a population attributable risk of 5.18 and 4.36%, respectively. For each index, the highest comorbidity burden was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (NIA/NCI: HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.14-4.01; Elixhauser: HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.09-1.42; ACE-27: HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.07-1.23; CCI: HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.05-1.42) and cancer-specific survival. The modified version of the CCI resulted in a higher predictive power compared with other indices studied (cancer-specific mortality HR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.37-4.08).

Conclusions: The comorbidity assessment tools provided better prognostic prevision of prospective outcome of colorectal cancer patients than single comorbid conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Apr;26(4):473-81 - PubMed
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Dec;22(12):1493-7 - PubMed
    1. BMC Cancer. 2009 Apr 20;9:116 - PubMed
    1. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Feb;24(1):e21-6 - PubMed
    1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Dec;54(12):1898-904 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources