Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;108(8):1385-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Jul 6.

Adjunctive lacosamide--5 years' clinical experience

Affiliations

Adjunctive lacosamide--5 years' clinical experience

Linda J Stephen et al. Epilepsy Res. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: In 2008, lacosamide (LCM) was licensed in Europe for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures. At that time a prospective audit was initiated at the Western Infirmary to assess outcomes with this antiepileptic drug (AED) in everyday clinical practice.

Methods: A total of 160 patients (74 M; 86 F, aged 14-74 years [median 42 years]) with uncontrolled focal-onset seizures (median monthly frequency 1; range 1-300) were started on LCM. After 12 weeks on stable AED doses (median 1 AED; range 1-4), LCM was added and the dose titrated as appropriate with a target range of 200-400 mg/day. Review took place every 6-8 weeks until 1 of 4 end-points was reached: seizure freedom for 6 months on a given LCM dose; ≥50% (responder) or <50% (marginal benefit) seizure reduction over 6 months compared with baseline on the highest tolerated LCM dose; withdrawal of LCM due to lack of efficacy, side effects, or both.

Results: Of the 160 patients, 35 (21.9%) remained seizure-free for at least 6 months on a stable LCM dose, while 35 (21.9%) had a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency and 54 (33.7%) reported a marginal benefit. Five patients became seizure-free on LCM monotherapy following withdrawal of their initial treatment. Outcomes were similar for patients taking LCM with traditional sodium blocking agents (n=56; 43 [76%] continued LCM) compared to those who also received AEDs with other mechanisms (n=84; 64 [76%] continued LCM). LCM was discontinued in 36 (22.5%) patients because of lack of efficacy (n=24, 15%) or side effects (n=12; 7.5%). Commonest side effects leading to withdrawal were nausea and vomiting, dizziness, sedation, headaches, tremor, and ataxia, particularly for patients also taking sodium valproate.

Conclusion: LCM is a well-tolerated and effective AED for focal-onset seizures with or without secondary generalisation, regardless of concomitant treatment. Commonest dose-related side effects were neurotoxic in nature.

Keywords: Adjunctive; Epilepsy; Focal; Lacosamide; Outcomes; Seizures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources