Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1989 Apr;30(4):171-4.

[Comparison of 2 anesthetic protocols in colonoscopy on a series of 100 patients]

[Article in French]
  • PMID: 2506771
Comparative Study

[Comparison of 2 anesthetic protocols in colonoscopy on a series of 100 patients]

[Article in French]
J L Germain et al. Agressologie. 1989 Apr.

Abstract

The quality of the anaesthesia and of the recovery (appreciated by Newman's test) of two anesthetic technics for colonoscopies are compared on two homogeneous groups from 50 patients each: propofol alone versus midazolam-alfentanyl association. The differences registered during anaesthesia, particularly concerning the breathing depression might be attributed to alfentanyl which has been used often at important doses. The recovery is delayed in the midazolam + alfentanyl's group in comparison with the propofol's group. The difference is very significant at 15 and 60 minutes. The use's safety and the fast recovery with propofol incite to advocate it as an unique+ anaesthetic agent for colonoscopies.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources