Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;134(2):283e-293e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000391.

Adopted children with cleft lip and/or palate: a unique and growing population

Affiliations

Adopted children with cleft lip and/or palate: a unique and growing population

Jordan W Swanson et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Standard clinical pathways are well established for children with cleft lip and/or palate. Treatment of internationally adopted children differs because of the late age at presentation, a newly evolving child-family relationship, and variable extent and quality of previous treatment.

Methods: The authors characterized the presentation and treatment patterns of all internationally adopted children with clefts at their institution between 1997 and 2011.

Results: Among 1841 children with clefts, 216 (12 percent) were internationally adopted: 78 percent had cleft lip and palate, 18 percent had cleft lip, and 4 percent had cleft palate. Patients originated predominantly from China (80 percent). Median age at presentation was 31 months, and the rate of new presentations increased five-fold during the study period. Eighty-two percent presented with prior cheiloplasty, and revision was recommended for 64 percent of them. Thirty-seven percent of patients had prior palatoplasty, of which 34 percent presented with a palatal fistula. Secondary palatoplasty/pharyngoplasty was performed more frequently for patients who underwent primary palatoplasty before adoption than after adoption (95 percent CI, 0.20 to 0.77). Overall, adoptees required secondary surgery more often than nonadoptees (49 percent versus 28 percent) regardless of where their primary surgery was performed. Changes in adoptee growth indices suggested improvements in systemic health following adoption.

Conclusions: Internationally adopted children with clefts have unique treatment challenges. Children with unrepaired clefts undergo surgery late, and children with prior repairs frequently undergo revision. Compared with nonadoptees, adoptees require more revisions and have a higher fistula rate. Further detailed study is important to optimize care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Webley K. The baby deficit. Time. 2013;181:34–39
    1. Hansson E, Svensson H, Becker M. Adopted children with cleft lip or palate, or both, require special needs cleft surgery. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46:75–79
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap): A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381
    1. Meng T, Shi B, Zheng Q, Wang Y, Li S. Clinical and epidemiologic studies of nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate in China: Analysis of 4268 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:264–269
    1. Sen A. Missing women. BMJ. 1992;304:587–588

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources