Delayed diagnosis of critical congenital heart defects: trends and associated factors
- PMID: 25070301
- PMCID: PMC9923616
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3949
Delayed diagnosis of critical congenital heart defects: trends and associated factors
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to examine trends in timing of diagnosis of critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) and factors associated with delayed diagnosis (diagnosis after discharge home following delivery).
Methods: We examined a population-based retrospective cohort of CCHD cases among live births identified through the Massachusetts Birth Defects Monitoring Program. Congenital heart defects were considered critical if the infant received corrective surgery, interventional catheterization, palliative care, or died as a result of the defect within 12 months of birth. Timing of initial diagnosis was classified as prenatal, postnatal before discharge home, or delayed. Demographic, perinatal, and mortality information was obtained from the Registry of Vital Records and Statistics. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were used to examine associations with delayed diagnosis.
Results: Among 460 467 live births to Massachusetts residents between 2004 and 2009, we identified 916 CCHD cases, of which 126 (13.8%) had delayed diagnosis. Rates of prenatal CCHD diagnosis increased from 44.9% in 2004 to 63.8% in 2009, whereas rates of delayed diagnosis decreased from 17.1% to 10.6% over the same time period. Among cases with delayed diagnosis, the most common defects were coarctation, pulmonary valve stenosis, and tetralogy of Fallot. Delayed diagnosis was associated with delivery outside a tertiary hospital (adjusted PR: 3.6 [95% confidence interval: 2.5-5.2]) and isolated CCHD (adjusted PR: 1.7 [95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.7]).
Conclusions: Despite increasing prenatal diagnosis of CCHDs, delayed diagnosis still occurs in over 10% of cases. Understanding factors associated with delayed diagnosis could help to improve prenatal and postnatal screening efforts, including pulse oximetry testing.
Keywords: critical congenital heart defects; delayed diagnosis; infant; neonatal; neonatal screening; newborn; prenatal diagnosis.
Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Bjornard K , Riehle-Colarusso T , Gilboa SM , Correa A . Patterns in the prevalence of congenital heart defects, metropolitan Atlanta, 1978 to 2005. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97(2):87–94 - PubMed
-
- Yang Q , Chen H , Correa A , Devine O , Mathews TJ , Honein MA . Racial differences in infant mortality attributable to birth defects in the United States, 1989–2002. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76(10):706–713 - PubMed
-
- Garg LF , Van Naarden Braun K , Knapp MM , et al. . Results from the New Jersey statewide critical congenital heart defects screening program. Pediatrics. 2013;132(2). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/132/2/e314 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kemper AR , Mahle WT , Martin GR , et al. . Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/128/5/e1259 - PubMed
-
- Mahle WT , Newburger JW , Matherne GP , et al. American Heart Association Congenital Heart Defects Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, and Committee on Fetus and Newborn . Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2009;120(5):447–458 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
