Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 1:2:e440.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.440. eCollection 2014.

Neighbourhood walkability, leisure-time and transport-related physical activity in a mixed urban-rural area

Affiliations

Neighbourhood walkability, leisure-time and transport-related physical activity in a mixed urban-rural area

Eric de Sa et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Objectives. To develop a walkability index specific to mixed rural/suburban areas, and to explore the relationship between walkability scores and leisure time physical activity. Methods. Respondents were geocoded with 500 m and 1,000 m buffer zones around each address. A walkability index was derived from intersections, residential density, and land-use mix according to built environment measures. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to quantify the association between the index and physical activity levels. Analyses used cross-sectional data from the 2007-2008 Canadian Community Health Survey (n = 1158; ≥18 y). Results. Respondents living in highly walkable 500 m buffer zones (upper quartiles of the walkability index) were more likely to walk or cycle for leisure than those living in low-walkable buffer zones (quartile 1). When a 1,000 m buffer zone was applied, respondents in more walkable neighbourhoods were more likely to walk or cycle for both leisure-time and transport-related purposes. Conclusion. Developing a walkability index can assist in exploring the associations between measures of the built environment and physical activity to prioritize neighborhood change.

Keywords: Built environment; Canadian Community Health Survey; Geographic Information Systems; Physical activity; Walkability index.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bennett GG, McNeill LH, Wolin KY, Duncan DT, Puleo E, Emmons KM. Safe to walk? Neighborhood safety and physical activity among public housing residents. PLoS Medicine. 2007;4(10):1599–1607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040306. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameron C, Craig C, Paolin S. Local opportunities for physical activity and sport: trends from 1999–2004. 2004. Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute—Physical activity benchmarks program. Available at http://www.cflri.ca/eng/statistics/surveys/documents/PAM_SPORT_2004.pdf .
    1. Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute (CFLRI) 2014. Homepage. Available at http://www.cflri.ca/ (accessed 20 June 2014)
    1. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) 2010. Canada’s physical activity guidelines for adultes: 18–64 years. Available at http://www.csep.ca/CMFiles/Guidelines/CSEP-InfoSheets-adults-ENG.pdf .
    1. Frank LD, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Leary L, Cain K, Conway TL, Hess PM. The development of a walkability index: application to the neighborhood quality of life study. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009;44(13):924–933. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources