Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;23(5):596-601.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.145. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 molecular diagnosis: what can NGS do for you when you have a large gene with loss of function mutations?

Affiliations

Neurofibromatosis type 1 molecular diagnosis: what can NGS do for you when you have a large gene with loss of function mutations?

Eric Pasmant et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May.

Abstract

Molecular diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is challenging owing to the large size of the tumour suppressor gene NF1, and the lack of mutation hotspots. A somatic alteration of the wild-type NF1 allele is observed in NF1-associated tumours. Genetic heterogeneity in NF1 was confirmed in patients with SPRED1 mutations. Here, we present a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of NF1 and SPRED1 using a multiplex PCR approach (230 amplicons of ∼150 bp) on a PGM sequencer. The chip capacity allowed mixing 48 bar-coded samples in a 4-day workflow. We validated the NGS approach by retrospectively testing 30 NF1-mutated samples, and then prospectively analysed 279 patients in routine diagnosis. On average, 98.5% of all targeted bases were covered by at least 20X and 96% by at least 100X. An NF1 or SPRED1 alteration was found in 246/279 (88%) and 10/279 (4%) patients, respectively. Genotyping throughput was increased over 10 times, as compared with Sanger, with ∼90[euro ] for consumables per sample. Interestingly, our targeted NGS approach also provided quantitative information based on sequencing depth allowing identification of multiexons deletion or duplication. We then addressed the NF1 somatic mutation detection sensitivity in mosaic NF1 patients and tumours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mutation dilution sequencing using NGS and Sanger methods. NGS allowed the mutation detection in all dilutions and also presented a quantitative aspect, providing the number of mutated reads. A good correspondence was found between the theoretical and the NGS observed mutation allele frequencies. Sanger sequence analysis with Seqscape v2.5 allowed mutation visualization only at 25 and 12.5%.

References

    1. Carey JC, Baty BJ, Johnson JP, Morrison T, Skolnick M, Kivlin J. The genetic aspects of neurofibromatosis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1986;486:45–56. - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Neurofibromatosis. Arch Neurol Chicago. 1988;45:575–578. - PubMed
    1. Tucker T, Wolkenstein P, Revuz J, Zeller J, Friedman JM. Association between benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in NF1. Neurology. 2005;65:205–211. - PubMed
    1. Clementi M, Barbujani G, Turolla L, Tenconi R. Neurofibromatosis-1: a maximum likelihood estimation of mutation rate. Hum Genet. 1990;84:116–118. - PubMed
    1. Fahsold R, Hoffmeyer S, Mischung C, et al. Minor lesion mutational spectrum of the entire NF1 gene does not explain its high mutability but points to a functional domain upstream of the GAP-related domain. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:790–818. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances