Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;34(8):4335-44.

Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions by split-bolus multidetector-row CT: diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose in oncologic patients

Affiliations
  • PMID: 25075068

Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions by split-bolus multidetector-row CT: diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose in oncologic patients

Michele Scialpi et al. Anticancer Res. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of split-bolus multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) protocol in the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions in oncologic patients.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed triphasic CT at initial diagnosis and follow-up split-bolus 64-detector row CT protocol in 48 oncologic patients with focal liver lesions. Split-bolus MDCT protocol by i.v. injection of two boli of contrast medium combines hepatic arterial phase (HAP) and hepatic enhancement during portal venous phase (PVP) in a single pass. First bolus: 75-90 mL at 2.0 mL/sec to obtain adequate hepatic enhancement during the PVP; second bolus: 60 mL/sec at 3.5 mL/sec to ensure HAP. Each bolus is followed by 20 mL of saline solution at the same flow rate. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of split-bolus MDCT protocol were calculated for detection and characterization of liver lesions. The effective radiation dose (ED) was calculated using dose-length product (DLP) values in mSv determined using a conversion factor.

Results: compared to triphasic-MDCT, split-bolus MDCT protocol confirmed all the 210 lesions identified and characterized by triphasic-MDCT technique, unchanged during the follow-up. The mean ED was 27.8 ± 6 mSv for chest-abdomen-pelvis biphasic split-bolus MDCT and 45.7 ± 13.6 mSv for triphasic-MDCT.

Conclusion: The diagnostic efficacy of split-bolus protocol is comparable to that of triphasic protocol at MDCT with a reduction in radiation dose of approximately 35-40%.

Keywords: Helical Computed Tomography (CT); Liver; Multidetector row CT (MDCT); neoplasm; oncology; split-bolus technique; triphasic technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources