Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Nov;121(5):937-47.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000393.

Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer

Chelsia Gillis et al. Anesthesiology. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The preoperative period (prehabilitation) may represent a more appropriate time than the postoperative period to implement an intervention. The impact of prehabilitation on recovery of function al exercise capacity was thus studied in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.

Methods: A parallel-arm single-blind superiority randomized controlled trial was conducted. Seventy-seven patients were randomized to receive either prehabilitation (n = 38) or rehabilitation (n = 39). Both groups received a home-based intervention of moderate aerobic and resistance exercises, nutritional counseling with protein supplementation, and relaxation exercises initiated either 4 weeks before surgery (prehabilitation) or immediately after surgery (rehabilitation), and continued for 8 weeks after surgery. Patients were managed with an enhanced recovery pathway. Primary outcome was functional exercise capacity measured using the validated 6-min walk test.

Results: Median duration of prehabilitation was 24.5 days. While awaiting surgery, functional walking capacity increased (≥ 20 m) in a higher proportion of the prehabilitation group compared with the rehabilitation group (53 vs. 15%, adjusted P = 0.006). Complication rates and duration of hospital stay were similar. The difference between baseline and 8-week 6-min walking test was significantly higher in the prehabilitation compared with the rehabilitation group (+23.7 m [SD, 54.8] vs. -21.8 m [SD, 80.7]; mean difference 45.4 m [95% CI, 13.9 to 77.0]). A higher proportion of the prehabilitation group were also recovered to or above baseline exercise capacity at 8 weeks compared with the rehabilitation group (84 vs. 62%, adjusted P = 0.049).

Conclusion: Meaningful changes in postoperative functional exercise capacity can be achieved with a prehabilitation program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Prehabilitation versus Rehabilitation.
    Bordes J, Cardinal M, Kaiser E. Bordes J, et al. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1438. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000661. Anesthesiology. 2015. PMID: 25988413 No abstract available.
  • In reply.
    Gillis C, Feldman LS, Gamsa A, Carli F. Gillis C, et al. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1438-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000662. Anesthesiology. 2015. PMID: 25988414 No abstract available.

Publication types