Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 11:3:353.
doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-353. eCollection 2014.

A thick placenta: a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes

Affiliations

A thick placenta: a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes

Ichiro Miwa et al. Springerplus. .

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an ultrasonographic measurement of placental thickness and the correlation of a thick placenta with adverse perinatal outcome.

Methods: Placental thickness was measured in single gravidas, 16 to 40 weeks of gestation, between 2005 and 2009. Placentas were considered to be thick if their measured thickness were above the 95th percentile for gestational age.

Results: The incidence of thick placentas was 4.3% (138/3,183). Perinatal morbidity and neonatal conditions were worse in cases with thick placenta rather than without thick placenta.

Conclusions: Ultrasonographic measurement of placental thickness is a simple method to estimate placental size. Thick placenta may be a useful predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Keywords: Measurement of placental thickness; Perinatal outcome; Thick placenta; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Placental thickness was measured at the thickest portion of the placenta or beneath the cord insertion, and in a representative portion perpendicular to the chorionic plate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Placentas were diagnosed as thick if they were above the 95th percentile for gestational age. Between 16 and 40 weeks of gestation, 4.3% (n = 138) of patients were diagnosed with thick placentas.

References

    1. Arabin B, Mohnhaupt A, Becker R, Weitzel HK. Comparison of the prognostic value of pulsed Doppler blood flow parameters to predict SGA and fetal distress. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;2:272–278. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1992.02040272.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bleker OP, Kloosterman GJ, Breur W, Mieras DJ. The volumetric growth of the human placenta: a longitudinal ultrasonic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;127:657–661. - PubMed
    1. de Paula CF, Ruano R, Campos JA, Zugaib M. Placental volumes measured by 3-dimensional ultrasonography in normal pregnancies from 12 to 40 weeks’ gestation. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:1583–1590. - PubMed
    1. Dombrowski MP, Wolfe HM, Saleh A, Evans MI, O’Brien J. The sonographically thick placenta: a predictor of increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;2:252–255. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1992.02040252.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elchalal U, Ezra Y, Levi Y, Bar-Oz B, Yanai N, Intrator O, Nadjari M. Sonographically thick placenta: a marker for increased perinatal risk–a prospective cross-sectional study. Placenta. 2000;21:268–272. doi: 10.1053/plac.1999.0466. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources