Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Nov;109(11):1801-10.
doi: 10.1111/add.12659. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

Electronic cigarettes: review of use, content, safety, effects on smokers and potential for harm and benefit

Affiliations
Review

Electronic cigarettes: review of use, content, safety, effects on smokers and potential for harm and benefit

Peter Hajek et al. Addiction. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Aims: We reviewed available research on the use, content and safety of electronic cigarettes (EC), and on their effects on users, to assess their potential for harm or benefit and to extract evidence that can guide future policy.

Methods: Studies were identified by systematic database searches and screening references to February 2014.

Results: EC aerosol can contain some of the toxicants present in tobacco smoke, but at levels which are much lower. Long-term health effects of EC use are unknown but compared with cigarettes, EC are likely to be much less, if at all, harmful to users or bystanders. EC are increasingly popular among smokers, but to date there is no evidence of regular use by never-smokers or by non-smoking children. EC enable some users to reduce or quit smoking.

Conclusions: Allowing EC to compete with cigarettes in the market-place might decrease smoking-related morbidity and mortality. Regulating EC as strictly as cigarettes, or even more strictly as some regulators propose, is not warranted on current evidence. Health professionals may consider advising smokers unable or unwilling to quit through other routes to switch to EC as a safer alternative to smoking and a possible pathway to complete cessation of nicotine use.

Keywords: Electronic cigarettes; harm reduction; prevalence; product safety; regulation; smoking cessation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest: PH, NB, and TE have no links with any e-cigarette manufacturer. JFE was reimbursed by a manufacturer of e-liquids for travelling to London and to China. HM was an investigator in a public-good funded ASCEND e-cigarette trial for which PGM International provided products at no cost, and has undertaken research on Ruyan e-cigarettes, for which the University of Auckland was funded by Health New Zealand, independently of Ruyan.

References

    1. Hon L. A Flameless electronic atomizing cigarette. Best Partners Worldwide Limited; Beaufort House, P.O. Box 438, Road Town, Tortola, VG: 2004.
    1. Dockrell M, Morison R, Bauld L, McNeill A. E-Cigarettes: Prevalence and Attitudes in Great Britain. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 May 23;15(10):1737–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Etter J-F, Bullen C. Electronic cigarette: users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy. Addiction. 2011;106:2017–28. - PubMed
    1. Etter J-F. Electronic cigarettes: a survey of users. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:231. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hong J, Luddy M, Feinstein J. E-cigarette Deep Dive Part 2: Framing the e-cig revolution. New York: Goldman Sachs; 2013.

Publication types

MeSH terms