Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 31;9(7):e101740.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101740. eCollection 2014.

Non-coding polymorphisms in nucleotide binding domain 1 in ABCC1 gene associate with transcript level and survival of patients with breast cancer

Affiliations

Non-coding polymorphisms in nucleotide binding domain 1 in ABCC1 gene associate with transcript level and survival of patients with breast cancer

Tereza Kunická et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) transporters may cause treatment failure by transporting of anticancer drugs outside of the tumor cells. Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 coded by the ABCC1 gene has recently been suggested as a potential prognostic marker in breast cancer patients. This study aimed to explore tagged haplotype covering nucleotide binding domain 1 of ABCC1 in relation with corresponding transcript levels in tissues and clinical phenotype of breast cancer patients.

Methods: The distribution of twelve ABCC1 polymorphisms was assessed by direct sequencing in peripheral blood DNA (n = 540).

Results: Tumors from carriers of the wild type genotype in rs35623 or rs35628 exhibited significantly lower levels of ABCC1 transcript than those from carriers of the minor allele (p = 0.003 and p = 0.004, respectively). The ABCC1 transcript levels significantly increased in the order CT-GT>CC-GT>CC-GG for the predicted rs35626-rs4148351 diplotype. Chemotherapy-treated patients carrying the T allele in rs4148353 had longer disease-free survival than those with the GG genotype (p = 0.043). On the other hand, hormonal therapy-treated patients with the AA genotype in rs35628 had significantly longer disease-free survival than carriers of the G allele (p = 0.012).

Conclusions: Taken together, our study shows that genetic variability in the nucleotide binding domain 1 has a significant impact on the ABCC1 transcript level in the target tissue and may modify survival of breast cancer patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Dr. Marketa Trnková is employed by a commercial company (Biolab Praha, k.s.). This does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of functional domains of ABCC1.
Figure depicts functional domains of ABCC1 protein (A) and important structural motifs within NBD1 (B). Data modified from NCBI’s Conserved Domain Database (CDD) .
Figure 2
Figure 2. Haplotype analysis of ABCC1 SNPs.
Figure indicates linkage disequilibrium plot (A) and three blocks comprising of SNP diplotypes (B) predicted from experimental data obtained in the present study. The likelihood of linkage of two tested SNPs increases from white to red color (A). Population frequency of diplotypes and connections from one diplotype block to the next one are shown (B). Analysis was performed by HaploView v4.2 program.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Significant associations between transcript levels and polymorphisms in ABCC1.
All SNPs and frequent diplotypes were analyzed but to retain concise style only significant associations are reported.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Significant associations between DFS of patients with breast carcinoma and SNPs in ABCC1.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients treated by chemotherapy (A) and hormonal therapy (B) were analyzed by Breslow test. In part A, dashed line represents DFS of patients with the GG genotype in rs4148353, while solid line indicates that of patients with the T allele. In part B, dashed line represents DFS of patients with the G allele in rs35628 and solid line DFS of those with the AA genotype. All SNPs have been analyzed but to retain concise style only significant associations are reported.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, et al. (2010) GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 (Internet). Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, http://globocan.iarc.fr.
    1. Biedler JL, Riehm H (1970) Cellular resistance to actinomycin D in Chinese hamster cells in vitro: cross-resistance, radioautographic, and cytogenetic studies. Cancer Res 30: 1174–1184. - PubMed
    1. Szakacs G, Annereau JP, Lababidi S, Shankavaram U, Arciello A, et al. (2004) Predicting drug sensitivity and resistance: profiling ABC transporter genes in cancer cells. Cancer Cell 6: 129–137. - PubMed
    1. Ferguson LR, De Flora S (2005) Multiple drug resistance, antimutagenesis and anticarcinogenesis. Mutat Res 591: 24–33. - PubMed
    1. Liscovitch M, Lavie Y (2002) Cancer multidrug resistance: a review of recent drug discovery research. IDrugs 5: 349–355. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances