Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016;44(1):201-8.
doi: 10.3109/21691401.2014.934458. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV: A right way to go or a long way to go?

Affiliations
Review

Pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV: A right way to go or a long way to go?

Wenya Yu et al. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016.

Abstract

Antiretroviral drugs are being tried as candidates for the pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against HIV for a considerable period, due to their potential for immediate inhibition of viral replication. Discrepancies in the findings called for a critical review of the relevant efforts and their outcomes. A systematic literature search identified 143 eligible articles of which only 5 reported complete findings while another 11 were still on-going. Observed moderate efficacy and good safety profile seemed to identify PrEP as a promising step for minimizing the spread of HIV to relatively unaffected population and controlling the epidemic among high risk population groups. But the duration of this efficacy was found to depend heavily on the availability, adherence and other related issues like cost, political commitment, ethical consideration etc. To prevent potential cultural and behavioral modifications, proper pre-administration counseling also seemed critical for the success of PrEP as a cost-effective intervention with adequate coverage.

Keywords: HIV prevention; antiretroviral therapy; controlling the HIV epidemic; pre-exposure prophylaxis; prevention of HIV spread.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission. Social science & medicine. 1997;44(9):1303–12. - PubMed
    1. Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9562):657–66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60313-4. [published Online First: Epub Date]|. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Templeton DJ, Millett GA, Grulich AE. Male circumcision to reduce the risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men. Current opinion in infectious diseases. 2010;23(1):45–52. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328334e54d. [published Online First: Epub Date]|. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fonner VA, Denison J, Kennedy CE, O’Reilly K, Sweat M. Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) for changing HIV-related risk behavior in developing countries. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012;9:CD001224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001224.pub4. [published Online First: Epub Date]|. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azcoaga-Lorenzo A, Ferreyra C, Alvarez A, Palma PP, Velilla E, del Amo J. Effectiveness of a PMTCT programme in rural Western Kenya. AIDS care. 2011;23(3):274–80. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.507750. [published Online First: Epub Date]|. - DOI - PubMed