Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;37(2):167-73.
doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1351-1. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant

Affiliations

Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant

Selda Yildiz et al. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the morphology of submandibular fossae at edentulous posterior regions of dried mandibles and to determine a safe range for proper lingual angulation during the placement of a dental implant in the posterior mandibular region, with a computerized tomographic scan study. Spiral computed tomographic images of 77 dry adult human mandibles were evaluated to determine the deepest area in the submandibular fossa. Then, the proper lingual angulations for the placement of a dental implant at these regions were measured. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to show the relation between the depths of submandibular fossa and lingual implant angulations. "Paired t test" was used for differences between the lingual implant angulations and the depths of submandibular fossa on each side of the mandibles. Depths of the submandibular fossa and lingual implant angulations were varied between 1.1 and 4.6 mm: 62°-84° on right side of the mandibles, and 1.1-4.5 mm, 65°-83° on left side of the mandibles. There were statistically medium negative correlations between the degree of lingual implant angulations and the depth of submandibular fossa on each side of the mandible (r = -0.44, p < 0.001, and r = -0.38, p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the right and left sides of the mandibles in terms of the depth of submandibular fossa (p = 0.01). Within the limits of this study, the depth of submandibular fossa was measured as ≥ 2 mm in around 71.5 % of examined regions, and lingual implant angulations were between 62° and 84°. These results may be considered by clinicians who are planning the dental implant placement in posterior mandible to avoid potential risk of lingual cortical plate perforation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Biomech. 1975;8(6):393-405 - PubMed
    1. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Nov;23(11):1243-53 - PubMed
    1. Implant Dent. 2011 Oct;20(5):360-3 - PubMed
    1. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr;15(2):226-32 - PubMed
    1. J Periodontol. 2011 Mar;82(3):395-402 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources