Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul 30;4(7):e005270.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005270.

Prevention of surgical site infection in lower limb skin lesion excisions with single dose oral antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective randomised placebo-controlled double-blind trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prevention of surgical site infection in lower limb skin lesion excisions with single dose oral antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective randomised placebo-controlled double-blind trial

Samuel C Smith et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of a single perioperative prophylactic 2 g dose of cephalexin in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) following excision of skin lesions from the lower limb.

Design: Prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled trial testing for difference in infection rates.

Setting: Primary care in regional North Queensland, Australia.

Participants: 52 patients undergoing lower limb skin lesion excision.

Interventions: 2 g dose of cephalexin 30-60 min before excision.

Main outcome measures: Incidence of SSI.

Results: Incidence of SSI was 12.5% (95% CI 2.7% to 32.4%) in the cephalexin group compared with 35.7% (95% CI 18.6% to 55.9%) in the placebo group (p=0.064). This represented an absolute reduction of 23.21% (95% CI -0.39% to 46.82%), relative reduction of 65.00% (95% CI -12.70% to 89.13%) and number-needed-to-treat of 4.3.

Conclusions: Administration of a single 2 g dose of cephalexin 30-60 min before skin lesion excision from the lower limb may produce a reduction in the incidence of infection; however, this study was underpowered to statistically determine this.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12611000595910.

Keywords: antibiotic prophylaxis; dermatological surgery; skin cancer excision; skin lesion excision; surgical site infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile (ROS, removal of sutures).

References

    1. Diepgen TL, Mahler V. The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 2002;146(Suppl 61):1–6 - PubMed
    1. Lens MB, Dawes M. Global perspectives of contemporary epidemiological trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2004;150:179–85 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Council Australia and Australian Cancer Network. Basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma (and related lesions)—A guide to clinical management in Australia. 2008
    1. Australian Cancer Network Melanoma Guidelines Revision Working Party. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of melanoma in Australia and New Zealand. Wellington: Cancer Council Australia and Australian Cancer Network, Sydney and New Zealand Guidelines Group, 2008
    1. Askew DA, Wilkinson D, Schluter PJ, et al. Skin cancer surgery in Australia 2001–2005: the changing role of the general practitioner. Med J Aust 2007;187:210–14 - PubMed

Publication types