Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Oct;21(5):944-53.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9945-x. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

Assessment of an intermediate reprojection technique transitioning from planar to SPECT radionuclide ventriculography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Assessment of an intermediate reprojection technique transitioning from planar to SPECT radionuclide ventriculography

Jim O'Doherty et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The technique of SPECT-RNV (radionuclide ventriculography) offers a greater amount of clinically usable data than its planar counterpart (P-RNV). In transitioning from planar to SPECT-only acquisition methodologies, reprojection of the SPECT data can provide a planar dataset which can be used as an interim technique. The aim of this study was to test if reprojected planar images could be used as a surrogate for true planar images in SPECT-only setting.

Methods: We performed SPECT-RNV and P-RNV on 47 patients on traditional sodium iodide (NaI) cameras, determining left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) for planar (EFP) and SPECT (EFS) techniques. We reprojected the SPECT-RNV data along the best septal separation angle determined from planar scanning. This creates a further planar dataset denoted 'reprojected P-RNV' (rP-RNV) giving a reprojected ejection fraction (EFR) which can be used as a validation variable in transitioning to SPECT-only acquisition.

Results: Performing t tests showed no statistical difference between EFP and EFR (P > .017) but bias was observed in EFS results compared to EFP and EFS compared to EFR results. An unblinded, comparison of parametric data between the three datasets for a subset of ten patients showed good clinical concordance. False negative and false positive rates were low for rP-RNV compared to P-RNV.

Conclusions: The reprojected planar LVEF correlates well to P-RNV EF values. The rP-RNV dataset can aid clinicians in transitioning from planar RNV to SPECT-only acquisition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Utility of reprojected tomograms.
    Nichols KJ, Van Tosh A. Nichols KJ, et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Oct;21(5):954-7. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9948-7. Epub 2014 Jul 26. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25063214 No abstract available.

References

    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999 Sep-Oct;6(5):498-506 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Jun;20(3):329-30 - PubMed
    1. Ann Nucl Med. 2003 Dec;17(8):711-6 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Nov;99(11):1227-8, 1231-4 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Jul;14(4):544-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources