Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;6(3):77-81.
Epub 2014 Jun 26.

Evaluation of Different Disinfactants on Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Quality of Type IV Gypsum Casts Retrieved from Elastomeric Impression Materials

Affiliations

Evaluation of Different Disinfactants on Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Quality of Type IV Gypsum Casts Retrieved from Elastomeric Impression Materials

P K Pal et al. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The present study was done to evaluate the dimensional stability and surface quality of Type IV gypsum casts retrieved from disinfected elastomeric impression materials.

Materials and methods: In an in vitro study contaminated impression material with known bacterial species was disinfected with disinfectants followed by culturing the swab sample to assess reduction in level of bacterial colony. Changes in surface detail reproduction of impression were assessed fallowing disinfection.

Results: All the three disinfectants used in the study produced a 100% reduction in colony forming units of the test organisms.

Conclusion: All the three disinfectants produced complete disinfection, and didn't cause any deterioration in surface detail reproduction. How to cite the article: Pal PK, Kamble SS, Chaurasia RR, Chaurasia VR, Tiwari S, Bansal D. Evaluation of dimensional stability and surface quality of type IV gypsum casts retrieved from disinfected elastomeric impression materials. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(3):77-81.

Keywords: Disinfectants; elastomeric impression materials; surface reproducibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None

Figures

None
Figure 1: Disinfectant used-alkaline glutaraldehyde and sodium hypochlorite.
None
Figure 2: Maxillary impression samples.
None
Figure 3: Maclarland opacity tube no.5 with equipments for culturing.
None
Figure 4: Stainless steel die, cylinder and piston.
None
Figure 5: Stereomicroscope.
None
Figure 6: Detail reproduction: Stereomicroscopic photographs. Field at ×20 (2% alkaline glutaraldehyde).

References

    1. S Doddamani, RA Patil, SA Gangadhar. Efficacy of various spray disinfectants on irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(6):764–769. - PubMed
    1. RK Samra, SV Bhide. Efficacy of different disinfectant systems on alginate and addition silicone impression materials of Indian and international origin: A comparative evaluation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10(3):182–189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. U Sukhija, M Rathee, N Kukreja, S Khindria, V Singh, J Palaskar. Efficacy of various disinfectants on dental impression materials. Internet J Dent Sci. 2009;9(1):1–6.
    1. SC Ahila, E Subramaniam. Comparative evaluation of dimensional stability and surface quality of gypsum casts retrieved from disinfected addition silicone impressions at various time intervals: An in vitro study. J Dent Oral Hyg. 2012;4(4):34–43.
    1. F Saleh Saber, N Abolfazli, M Kohsoltani. The effect of disinfection by spray atomization on dimensional accuracy of condensation silicone impressions. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2010;4(4):124–129. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources