Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Apr;5(2):67-86.
doi: 10.1177/2042098614524430.

Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review

Konstantinos E Farsalinos et al. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes are a recent development in tobacco harm reduction. They are marketed as less harmful alternatives to smoking. Awareness and use of these devices has grown exponentially in recent years, with millions of people currently using them. This systematic review appraises existing laboratory and clinical research on the potential risks from electronic cigarette use, compared with the well-established devastating effects of smoking tobacco cigarettes. Currently available evidence indicates that electronic cigarettes are by far a less harmful alternative to smoking and significant health benefits are expected in smokers who switch from tobacco to electronic cigarettes. Research will help make electronic cigarettes more effective as smoking substitutes and will better define and further reduce residual risks from use to as low as possible, by establishing appropriate quality control and standards.

Keywords: e-liquid; e-vapor; electronic cigarettes; harm reduction; nicotine; safety; tobacco.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: Riccardo Polosa is a Professor of Medicine and is supported by the University of Catania, Italy. He has received lecture fees and research funding from GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer, manufacturers of stop smoking medications. He has also served as a consultant for Pfizer and Arbi Group Srl (Milano, Italy), the distributor of Categoria™ e-Cigarettes. His research on electronic cigarettes is currently supported by LIAF (Lega Italiana AntiFumo).

Konstantinos Farsalinos is a researcher at Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center. He has never been funded by the pharmaceutical or the tobacco industry. For some of his studies, the institution has received financial compensation from electronic cigarette companies for the studies’ cost. His salary is currently being paid by a scholarship grant from the Hellenic Society of Cardiology.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Examples of electronic cigarette devices currently available on the market.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Methodology for literature research and selection of studies.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Toxic emissions score, adjusted for nicotine, for electronic cigarette and popular cigarette brands. (Reproduced with permission from Laugesen [2009])

References

    1. Adkison S., O’Connor R., Bansal-Travers M., Hyland A., Borland R., Yong H.H., et al. . (2013) Electronic nicotine delivery systems: international tobacco control four-country survey. Am J Prev Med 44: 207–215 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ambrose J., Barua R. (2004) The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: an update. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 1731–1737 - PubMed
    1. American Chemistry Council (2003) Ethylene Glycols: Considerations Against Use in Theatrical Fogs/Mist and Artificial Smoke. Available at: http://www.americanchemistry.com/ProductsTechnology/Ethylene-Glycols-2/P... (Accessed: 20 November 2013).
    1. Antal M., Mok W., Roy J., T-Raissi A. (1985) Pyrolytic sources of hydrocarbons from biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrol 8: 291–303
    1. Aubin H., Rollema H., Svensson T., Winterer G. (2012) Smoking, quitting, and psychiatric disease: A review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36: 271–284 - PubMed