Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;39(5):342-64.
doi: 10.1080/87565641.2014.939179.

Processing of intentional and automatic number magnitudes in children born prematurely: evidence from fMRI

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Processing of intentional and automatic number magnitudes in children born prematurely: evidence from fMRI

Elise Klein et al. Dev Neuropsychol. 2014.
Free PMC article

Erratum in

  • Dev Neuropsychol. 2014;39(8):646

Abstract

This study examined the neural correlates of intentional and automatic number processing (indexed by number comparison and physical Stroop task, respectively) in 6- and 7-year-old children born prematurely. Behavioral results revealed significant numerical distance and size congruity effects. Imaging results disclosed (1) largely overlapping fronto-parietal activation for intentional and automatic number processing, (2) a frontal to parietal shift of activation upon considering the risk factors gestational age and birth weight, and (3) a task-specific link between math proficiency and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal within distinct regions of the parietal lobes-indicating commonalities but also specificities of intentional and automatic number processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Panel A (blue) shows activation in the physical Stroop task, while Panel B (yellow) depicts cortical areas associated with the processing of the number processing task. As can be seen, the fronto-parietal areas observed were nearly identical. Only in the number comparison task, additional activation in the inferior frontal gyrus is observed. Panel C depicts the conjunction over the two experimental tasks (given in red).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Panel A depicts activation associated with the covariate gestational age. While a lower gestational age was associated with bilateral inferior frontal activation (green), a larger gestational age was associated with predominant activation in bilateral parietal regions (red) as well as bilateral superior temporal areas. Panel B shows primarily extended parietal activation associated with a larger birth weight comprising left intraparietal sulcus (IPS), bilateral angular gyrus, precuneus, postcentral gyrus. Panel C depicts activation associated with lower general cognitive ability (as indexed by estimated intelligence). The picture is dominated by frontal activation in the supplementary motor area, bileratal inferior frontal and left middle frontal gyrus but also extends into parietal regions such as the IPS. Panel D depicts activation associated with math proficiency (as indexed by TEDI-MATH scores). While higher math proficiency was associated with left inferior frontal activation (red), lower math proficiency was found to activate the fronto-parietal network (green), including bilateral parietal regions, bilateral superior temporal areas, right inferior frontal and bilateral middle frontal cortices.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Panel A depicts the activation in the left superior parietal lobule on the cytoarchitectonic brain maps, while Panel B shows the activation center in the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS). The bar charts below the activation figures depict the corresponding beta estimates for the respective brain region. Note that differential effects can be found in these regions for physical and numerical magnitude processing: while the physical Stroop task elicited larger activation in the left superior parietal lobule, the number comparison task led to stronger activations of the IPS. Note. BW = birth weight; GCA = general cognitive abilities; TM = TEDI-MATH; EOI = effects of interest.

References

    1. Aarnoudse-Moens C. S., Weisglas-Kuperus N., van Goudoever B., Oosterlaan J. Meta-analysis of neurobehavioral outcomes in very preterm and/or very low birth weight children. Pediatrics. 2009:717–728. - PubMed
    1. Ansari D. Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2008:278–291. - PubMed
    1. Ansari D., Dhital B. Age-related changes in the activation of the intraparietal sulcus during nonsymbolic magnitude processing: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006:1820–1828. - PubMed
    1. Ansari D., Garcia N., Lucas E., Hamon K., Dhital B. Neural correlates of symbolic number processing in children and adults. Neuroreport. 2005:1769–1773. - PubMed
    1. Arsalidou M., Taylor M. J. Is 2+2=4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations. Neuroimage. 2011:2382–2393. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources