Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 4;9(8):e103886.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103886. eCollection 2014.

User perceptions of shared sanitation among rural households in Indonesia and Bangladesh

Affiliations

User perceptions of shared sanitation among rural households in Indonesia and Bangladesh

Kali B Nelson et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: The practice of sharing sanitation facilities does not meet the current World Health Organization/UNICEF definition for what is considered improved sanitation. Recommendations have been made to categorize shared sanitation as improved sanitation if security, user access, and other conditions can be assured, yet limited data exist on user preferences with respect to shared facilities.

Objective: This study analyzed user perceptions of shared sanitation facilities in rural households in East Java, Indonesia, and Bangladesh.

Methods: Cross-sectional studies of 2,087 households in East Java and 3,000 households in Bangladesh were conducted using questionnaires and observational methods. Relative risks were calculated to analyze associations between sanitation access and user perceptions of satisfaction, cleanliness, and safety.

Results: In East Java, 82.4% of households with private improved sanitation facilities reported feeling satisfied with their place of defecation compared to 68.3% of households with shared improved facilities [RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09, 1.31]. In Bangladesh, 87.7% of households with private improved facilities reported feeling satisfied compared to 74.5% of households with shared improved facilities [RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.10, 1.20]. In East Java, 79.5% of households who reported a clean latrine also reported feeling satisfied with their place of defecation; only 38.9% of households who reported a dirty latrine also reported feeling satisfied [RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.45, 2.08].

Conclusion: Simple distinctions between improved and unimproved sanitation facilities tend to misrepresent the variability observed among households sharing sanitation facilities. Our results suggest that private improved sanitation is consistently preferred over any other sanitation option. An increased number of users appeared to negatively affect toilet cleanliness, and lower levels of cleanliness were associated with lower levels of satisfaction. However, when sanitation facilities were clean and shared by a limited number of households, users of shared facilities often reported feeling both satisfied and safe.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. WHO/UNICEF (2013) Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation: 2013 Update. Available: http://www.unicef.org/wash/files/JMP2013final_en.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2013.
    1. WHO/UNICEF (2012) Proposal for consolidated drinking water, sanitation and hygiene targets, indicators and definitions. Available: http://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/resources/A-proposal-for-co.... Accessed 05 July 2013.
    1. WHO/UNICEF (2010) Improved and unimproved water and sanitation facilities. Available: http://www.wssinfo.org/definitions-methods/watsan-categories/. Accessed 07 October 2012.
    1. Norman G (February 2011) When are communal or public toilets an appropriate option? Water and Sanitation for the Urban Poor. Available: http://www.wsscc.org/sites/default/files/publications/wsup_topicbriefico.... Accessed 07 October 2012.
    1. Rodgers AF, Ajono LA, Gyapong JO, Hagan M, Emerson PM (2007) Characteristics of latrine promotion participants and non-participants; inspection of latrines; and perceptions of household latrines in Northern Ghana. Trop Med Int Health 12: 772–782 10.1111/j.13653156.2007.01848.x - DOI - PubMed