Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
- PMID: 25097013
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.004
Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: To investigate the impact of breast density on the performance of radiologists when mammograms are digitally acquired and displayed.
Materials and methods: A total of 150 craniocaudal digital mammograms including 75 cases with cancer were examined by 14 radiologists divided into two groups: those who read more (six) and less (eight) than 2000 mammograms per year. Cases were classified as low or high mammographic density. For both types of cases, detection of cancers within and outside the dense fibroglandular tissue was investigated. The performance of radiologist was measured using jack-knife free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) figure of merit (FOM).
Results: Radiologists with over 2000 annual reads had significantly higher JAFROC FOM (P = .03) for high (0.76) mammographic density compared to low (0.70) mammographic density cases. When lesions overlaid the fibroglandular tissue, cases with high mammographic density compared to low mammographic density displayed increased location sensitivity for all radiologists (P = .03) and for those radiologists reading more than 2000 mammograms annually (P = .04), whereas JAFROC FOMs increased for all radiologists (P = .05). No significant changes were observed when the lesion was outside the fibroglandular region.
Conclusions: Increased mammographic density improves the performance of experienced radiologists when using digital mammograms. This finding, which does not align with those previously reported for film screen systems, may be because of windowing/leveling opportunities available with digital images.
Keywords: Digital mammography; breast cancer; cancer detection; mammographic density; radiologists' performance.
Copyright © 2014 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Acad Radiol. 2014. PMID: 25172414
-
Does mammographic density remain a radiological challenge in the digital era?Acta Radiol. 2021 Jun;62(6):707-714. doi: 10.1177/0284185120938367. Epub 2020 Jul 5. Acta Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32623914
-
Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings.Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):61-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122581. Epub 2013 Jun 4. Radiology. 2013. PMID: 23737538
-
Can mammographic assessments lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer?Eur J Radiol. 2013 Mar;82(3):404-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Feb 4. Eur J Radiol. 2013. PMID: 20133095 Review.
-
A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.Med Image Anal. 2010 Apr;14(2):87-110. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2009.12.005. Epub 2009 Dec 29. Med Image Anal. 2010. PMID: 20071209 Review.
Cited by
-
Reducing ' probably benign ' assessments in normal mammograms: The role of radiologist experience.Eur J Radiol Open. 2023 Jun 14;10:100498. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100498. eCollection 2023. Eur J Radiol Open. 2023. PMID: 37359179 Free PMC article.
-
Mammographic densities of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women living in Australia's Northern Territory.Int J Public Health. 2019 Sep;64(7):1085-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01237-w. Epub 2019 Apr 2. Int J Public Health. 2019. PMID: 30941443
-
Breast Density Knowledge and Awareness: A Review of Literature.J Prim Care Community Health. 2016 Jul;7(3):207-14. doi: 10.1177/2150131916633138. Epub 2016 Feb 23. J Prim Care Community Health. 2016. PMID: 26906525 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mammographic Density Distribution in Ras Al Khaimah (RAK): Relationships with Demographic and Reproductive Factors.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jun 25;19(6):1607-1616. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.6.1607. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018. PMID: 29936786 Free PMC article.
-
Deep transfer learning hybrid techniques for precision in breast cancer tumor histopathology classification.Health Inf Sci Syst. 2025 Feb 11;13(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s13755-025-00337-7. eCollection 2025 Dec. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2025. PMID: 39949707
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical