Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2014 Aug 5:3:e03811.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.03811.

The spinal cord is never at rest

Affiliations
Comment

The spinal cord is never at rest

Falk Eippert et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Even when we are at rest, our spinal cords show spontaneous, yet well organised, fluctuations of activity that might reflect sensory and motor networks.

Keywords: 7 Tesla; fMRI; functional connectivity; resting state; spinal cord.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests:The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Resting-state signals in the human spinal cord.
(A) Horizontal section of a brain (top) and a spinal cord (middle, bottom); the small size of the spinal cord makes it difficult to image neuronal activity. The spinal cord contains two ventral horns (one outlined in red) that are involved in motor function, and two dorsal horns (one outlined in green) that are involved in sensory function. (B) Barry et al. measured the correlation between spontaneous fluctuations in the fMRI signal in the ventral horns (red traces; top) and the dorsal horns (green traces; bottom). This revealed that the ventral horns show a positive correlation with each other, as do the dorsal horns. However, there is no significant correlation between ventral and dorsal horns. This suggests that at rest, the spinal cord is intrinsically organised into two separate networks, corresponding to motor and sensory functions. (C) Possible mechanisms that could explain the spontaneous activity in the spinal cord include input from the peripheral nervous system (top), locally generated rhythms from the interneurons within spinal networks (middle), and ongoing communication between the brain and spinal cord (bottom).

Comment on

References

    1. Barry RL, Smith SA, Dula AN, Gore JC. 2014. Resting state functional connectivity in the human spinal cord. eLife 3:e02812. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02812 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birn RM. 2012. The role of physiological noise in resting-state functional connectivity. NeuroImage 62:864–870. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buckner RL, Krienen FM, Yeo BT. 2013. Opportunities and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Nature Neuroscience 16:832–837. doi: 10.1038/nn.3423 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cole MW, Bassett DS, Power JD, Braver TS, Petersen SE. 2014. Intrinsic and task-evoked network architectures of the human brain. Neuron 83:238–251. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finsterbusch J, Sprenger C, Büchel C. 2013. Combined T2*-weighted measurements of the human brain and cervical spinal cord with a dynamic shim update. NeuroImage 79:153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.021 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources