Prospective randomized study to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty and compare it with retrocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric and adolescent patients
- PMID: 25097310
- PMCID: PMC4120211
- DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.128499
Prospective randomized study to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty and compare it with retrocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric and adolescent patients
Abstract
Objective: This prospective randomized study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty (TMP) and compare it with retrocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) in pediatric and adolescent patients.
Materials and methods: Between September 2006 to May 2012, data of pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty were recorded in a prospective manner. Data included age, pelvic volume, presence of stones, aberrant vessels, operative time, analgesics requirement and time to accept oral feeds and drain removal. Patients with left side pelviureteric junction obstruction with any size of pelvic volume, with or without renal stones and aberrant vessels were included in the study. Patients were assigned into two groups by simple randomization technique. A total of 38 TMP and 41 left sided RLP were performed. Median follow-up period for transmesocolic group was 12.5 months (9.5-62 months) and 14 months (8-66 months) for retro colic group. Outcome for this study was adequate drainage on renal scan, improvement in symptom and or resolution of hydronephrosis on ultrasound. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test.
Results: The mean patient age was 8.73 years in RLP and 7.73 years in TMP. In RLP group the mean operative time was 75.84 min (time from port insertion to pyeloplasty) and 135.4 min (total operative time) while it was 44.82 min and 104.82 min respectively in TMP group. Compared with classic RLP, TMP cases showed a significant reduction in operative time.
Conclusions: The transmesocolic approach for left sided pyeloplasty enables a shorter operative time even in the presence of large pelvis, aberrant vessel and stones without increasing morbidity in comparison to RLP approach.
Keywords: Pyeloplasty; retrocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty; transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Prospective clinical trial to compare standard colon-reflecting with transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty.BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1814-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11081.x. Epub 2012 Apr 13. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22500855 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Dec;83(4):169-74. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011. PMID: 22670313
-
Transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a standard approach for the left-side repair.J Pediatr Urol. 2010 Apr;6(2):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.06.010. Epub 2009 Jul 26. J Pediatr Urol. 2010. PMID: 19635682
-
Is secondary robotic pyeloplasty safe and effective as primary robotic pyeloplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):241-248. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00997-0. Epub 2019 Jul 6. J Robot Surg. 2020. PMID: 31280462
-
Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction via Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Approaches.Front Pediatr. 2021 Jul 29;9:707266. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.707266. eCollection 2021. Front Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 34395345 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Unusual cause of renal stone following robotic pyeloplasty.BMJ Case Rep. 2017 Mar 13;2017:bcr2017219374. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-219374. BMJ Case Rep. 2017. PMID: 28289002 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Munver R, Sosa RE, del Pizzo JJ. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: History, evolution, and future. J Endourol. 2004;18:748–55. - PubMed
-
- Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology. 1995;46:791–5. - PubMed
-
- Murphy JT. The kidney. In: Murphy JT, Desnos E, editors. History of Urology. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas; 1972. p. 201.
-
- Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL. Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1977;118:162–5. - PubMed
-
- Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1993;150:1795–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources